Understand Your Rights. Solve Your Legal Problems
winecapanimated1250x200 optimize
Legal News

Lawmakers Mull Changing Section 230 in Social Media Hearing

Reading Time:
2
 minutes
Posted: 18th November 2020
Jacob Mallinder
Share this article
In this Article

The chief executive officers of Twitter and Facebook testified before Congress on Tuesday in a hearing during which several lawmakers raised the possibility of amending or repealing the protections that social media platforms currently hold under US law.

Jack Dorsey and Mark Zuckerberg were issued subpoenas in October to appear at the hearing on Tuesday in order to “review the companies’ handling of the 2020 election”. Throughout the hearing they faced challenges from Republican and Democratic senators on their platforms’ content moderation policies and what their users are allowed to post.

Republican lawmakers focused on the companies’ decisions to limit the circulation of an article from the New York Post about Hunter Biden in October. Twitter at the time blocked users from posting links or images of the report due to scepticism over the authenticity of “the origins of the materials” within the article, allegedly pulled from a laptop left by Hunter Biden at an independent computer repair shop in Delaware. The company later walked its response back, while Facebook placed milder limitations on the sharing of the article due to questions about its validity.

“When you have companies that have the power of government, have far more power than traditional media outlets, something has to give,” said Senate Judiciary Committee chairman Lindsey Graham, adding that he hoped Section 230 could be changed.

Meanwhile, Democratic lawmakers focused on the platforms’ policies towards violent speech, with Senator Richard Blumenthal attacking Facebook’s refusal to shut down the account of former White House adviser Steven Bannon after he suggested the beheading of two US officials.

[ymal]

Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996 holds that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider", effectively ensuring social media networks are not held liable for the posts of their users. President-elect Biden has said that he favours repealing Section 230, while Congressional Democrats have suggested reforming the law more deliberately.

During an October hearing, Dorsey and Zuckerberg indicated openness to some reforms in the law governing social media content.

Lawyer Monthly Ad

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

osgoodepd lawyermonthly 1100x100 oct2025
generic banners explore the internet 1500x300

JUST FOR YOU

9 (1)
Sign up to our newsletter for the latest Government Updates
Subscribe to Lawyer Monthly Magazine Today to receive all of the latest news from the world of Law.
skyscraperin genericflights 120x600tw centro retargeting 0517 300x250

About the Author

Jacob Mallinder
Jacob has been working around the Legal Industry for over 10 years, whether that's writing for Lawyer Monthly or helping to conduct interviews with Lawyers across the globe. In his own time, he enjoys playing sports, walking his dogs, or reading.
More information
Connect with LM

About Lawyer Monthly

Legal News. Legal Insight. Since 2009

Follow Lawyer Monthly