Understand Your Rights. Solve Your Legal Problems
The Pokémon Company has confirmed Mega Lucario Z for Pokémon Legends: Z-A – Mega Dimension, marking the debut of a new Z Mega Evolution system.
Pokémon’s latest update introduces a new transformation mechanic for the upcoming Pokémon Legends: Z-A – Mega Dimension. The announcement confirms that Mega Lucario Z will be the first Pokémon to use the feature when the game arrives on 10 December 2025. The reveal outlines how Z Mega Evolution alters Lucario’s speed, aura use and defensive options, creating a different approach from previous forms.
The development matters for players who track changes to the series’ battle systems. Z Mega Evolution adds a tool designed for short, high-pressure encounters, offering a contrast to traditional Mega Evolution, Z-Moves and Terastallization. The update also comes as Nintendo prepares for one of its largest Switch releases of the year, with global preorders already open.
Mega Lucario Z is shown on a battle court in Pokémon Legends: Z-A – Mega Dimension, highlighting the new aura-focused Z Mega Evolution form.
Z Mega Evolution speeds up the time between a trainer’s command and the Pokémon’s action. The form drains Mega Power at a faster rate, which limits its role in longer fights.
Mega Lucario Z shifts from the offence-focused design of Mega Lucario. Its aura forms a full-body layer that increases defensive stability and movement. The aura can also be shaped into barriers or directed into limbs for targeted strikes.
The Pokémon keeps its Fighting and Steel typing. No further Z Mega Evolutions have been confirmed.
Z Mega Evolution follows a long line of mechanic updates introduced near the release of major titles, a pattern seen with Dynamax in Sword and Shield.
The feature creates a tempo-based option built for rapid decisions.
Pokémon Legends: Z-A – Mega Dimension will be available to play on December 10, 2025, and is already available for preorder.
The Pokémon Company released the details through its official site and video channels. Early community discussion has centred on how Z Mega Evolution compares to older systems such as the Generation VII Z-Move mechanic. Many players have focused on the short-burst power model and its potential impact on competitive rulesets.
Online forums have also highlighted interest in whether more Z Mega Evolutions will be announced before launch.
The reaction shows strong attention and an interest in how the mechanic will scale.
Players who follow competitive formats may need to adjust team strategies once the new system is tested. Mechanics that shorten action windows can influence item choices, move selections and ability priorities. Past changes, such as the introduction of Mega Evolution in 2013, reshaped entire team structures across official tournaments.
The update also fits broader industry trends. Major franchises often reveal core mechanics early to sustain preorder interest and support launch marketing.
The feature is positioned to influence both casual play and competitive adaptation.
Historical sales figures provide context for the timing of this reveal. Pokémon Legends: Arceus exceeded 14 million sales worldwide, making it one of the best-performing Switch titles. The introduction of a new battle feature for Z-A follows a similar communication pattern, where early gameplay details support visibility and retention ahead of release.
Data suggests mechanic-focused announcements often boost prelaunch engagement.
The official reveal video is available on the Pokémon website. Additional clips and updates can be viewed on the series’ YouTube channel, though users are redirected to external platforms with separate privacy policies.
Pokémon Legends: Z-A – Mega Dimension launches on Nintendo Switch. Preorders are open through the Nintendo eShop and authorised retailers in all supported regions.
Players can access updates through official channels and standard Nintendo storefronts.
Z Mega Evolution is a new transformation for select Pokémon in Pokémon Legends: Z-A – Mega Dimension. It reduces the delay between commands and actions but uses Mega Power more quickly than standard Mega Evolution.
Mega Lucario Z strengthens defence and mobility by surrounding its body in aura. This aura can form protective shapes or reinforce limbs to boost physical attacks.
No. Mega Lucario Z keeps the Fighting and Steel type combination. No type changes have been announced.
The Pokémon Company has not confirmed additional Z Mega Evolutions. Mega Lucario Z is the first revealed for the new mechanic.
The game will be released worldwide on 10 December 2025. Preorders are currently available.
Nintendo and The Pokémon Company typically release more gameplay details in the months before a major launch. Further updates may include region previews, feature breakdowns or system explanations.
The only confirmed milestone is the global release on 10 December 2025.
Mega Lucario Z introduces a new evolution system that focuses on fast execution and short-duration strength. The update affects how players plan battles and manage resources in Pokémon Legends: Z-A – Mega Dimension. With preorders live and more information expected before launch, players now have early insight into how Z Mega Evolution will shape the next entry in the series. The mechanic adds another layer to long-term battle design and will be closely watched once the game arrives.
The commitment broadens access to new federally backed children’s investment accounts for families in lower-income ZIP codes across the United States.
The Michael & Susan Dell Foundation has pledged $6.25 billion to help seed investment accounts for about 25 million children in the United States.
The announcement followed confirmation from CNBC that the pledge will work alongside the federal government’s new tax-advantaged “Trump accounts,” which begin for children born between 2025 and 2028. The Dell funding covers children who fall outside the federal birth window, focusing on those aged 10 and under in ZIP codes with median incomes below $150,000. Invest America, a policy advocacy group partnering with the foundation, described the donation as the largest private investment in U.S. children to date.
The pledge matters because it expands access to long-term savings tools beyond the federal rollout. Families with older children, who would not have received federal seed funding, gain access to a similar start. The model also signals a larger shift toward shared public and private support for children’s financial platforms, raising questions about how employers, community groups and investment firms will structure their own participation before the program’s launch.
The federal program provides a $1,000 contribution for eligible children born from 2025 to 2028. Accounts are set to open on July 4, 2026. Parents will need to open an account for funds to be deposited, with IRS instructions still pending.
The Dell commitment adds a $250 contribution for qualifying children born before 2025. This expansion brings millions of older children into a program that would otherwise focus only on newborns.
Invest America worked to advance the legislation behind the accounts and has compared the concept to earlier state-level children’s savings programs. For example, Maine’s Harold Alfond Foundation has offered universal $500 educational grants since 2008, though that effort reaches far fewer families.
The accounts can only invest in low-cost index funds tied to broad U.S. market benchmarks. This design aims to reduce risk and fee exposure over time.
The takeaway: the pledge enlarges the program’s reach and accelerates participation across income brackets.
Public discussion has focused on the scale of the effort and its potential effect on long-term wealth inequality. Policymakers involved in the program have emphasised the role of early financial exposure in improving long-term outcomes. Analysts in the philanthropy sector note that this is one of the few U.S. programs that links federal grants, employer matches and private donations under a unified framework.
Families have raised practical questions online, mainly about eligibility and the steps required to open an account. Comparisons to 529 college-savings plans remain common, as the Trump accounts serve a broader set of long-term financial goals.
The takeaway: reaction has centred on access, clarity and the system’s long-term potential.
The accounts act as long-term investment tools. They are not designed for short-term withdrawals, and funds remain locked until the child turns 18. This means parents must navigate account setup, onboarding and documentation to receive federal or private contributions.
The Dell commitment also marks one of the largest private expansions of a federal savings program. Previous efforts, such as statewide college-savings incentives, reached far smaller populations. By linking employer matches, private donations and federal grants, the program could shape future benefit models in ways similar to how auto-enrolment reshaped retirement plans in the 2000s.
The takeaway: the program may influence how employers and policymakers approach children’s savings benefits.
Federal data on broad U.S. index funds shows that long-term exposure typically outperforms traditional savings accounts over decades. Studies cited by program advocates indicate that children with early savings accounts are more likely to complete higher education and maintain long-term employment. These findings align with earlier research from institutions such as the Center for Social Development, which has documented the effect of early asset ownership on long-term outcomes.
The takeaway: available research supports early investment exposure as a factor in long-term financial and educational stability.
Parents will be able to open Trump accounts from July 4, 2026, once participating financial institutions receive final guidance from the Treasury and the IRS. Children born between 2025 and 2028 receive the $1,000 federal contribution once the account is active. Children aged 10 and under in qualifying ZIP codes receive the Dell-funded $250 contribution.
Funds can only be placed in low-cost index-tracking investments. Assets transfer into an IRA when the child reaches age 18, and withdrawals follow standard retirement-account tax rules.
The takeaway: families must open the account to access either federal or philanthropic funds.
Children born in the United States from 2025 through 2028 qualify once they have a Social Security number. Parents must open the account to activate the deposit. The IRS will release detailed instructions before the launch.
Children aged 10 or under born before January 1, 2025, in ZIP codes with median incomes of $150,000 or less qualify. Invest America says eligibility is automatic after account creation.
These accounts support general long-term saving, not only education. They convert to IRAs at age 18. Investment options are limited to low-cost market-tracking funds, and withdrawals after rollover are taxed under IRA rules.
Yes. Dell Technologies has said it will match the $1,000 federal grants for eligible children of its employees. Other employers may adopt similar policies.
Several countries, including the UK, have used child trust-style accounts, but none currently operate at a scale that combines federal grants with significant private funding.
The Treasury and IRS will issue final instructions outlining account setup, verification processes and investment guidelines. Financial institutions will prepare digital platforms for onboarding. Employers and philanthropic groups may announce additional matches or contributions as the launch approaches.
The takeaway: rollout now moves from legislation to implementation, with operational guidance pending.
The Dell family’s $6.25 billion pledge expands a new national savings program to millions of additional children. The combined government-private model aims to build long-term financial security from early childhood, especially in lower-income communities. Families will soon need clear guidance on eligibility and setup as financial institutions prepare for the 2026 launch. The program’s long-term impact will depend on participation, ongoing contributions and broader support from employers and donors.
👉 Also trending: Jada Pinkett Smith sued for alleged death threat: inside the $3M claim shaking Hollywood 👈
Johnnie Faye Cartwright has pleaded not guilty to six charges—including DUI and reckless endangerment—after a high-risk incident involving her three children and fiancé Zachery Ty Bryan on Nov. 29. A judge has now issued a domestic-violence-related no contact order as Bryan remains jailed for a probation-violating assault charge. The case is escalating quickly with major legal consequences ahead.
Zachery Ty Bryan’s latest mugshot alongside a recent family photo with fiancée Johnnie Faye Cartwright and their child, highlighting the contrast between his public image and ongoing legal troubles.
The spiralling legal troubles surrounding Home Improvement actor Zachery Ty Bryan intensified this week as his fiancée, Johnnie Faye Cartwright, stood before an Oregon judge just 48 hours after their simultaneous arrests.
The 32-year-old mother of three pleaded not guilty on Dec. 1 to a series of misdemeanor charges, including driving under the influence and recklessly endangering another person, following what deputies describe as a dangerous confrontation along Big Fall Creek Road near Lowell on Nov. 29.
Authorities allege Cartwright crashed a pickup truck carrying the couple’s three young children after attempting to strike Bryan, who had stepped out of the vehicle moments earlier. Deputies say both adults showed signs of impairment, raising immediate concerns not only about criminal liability but the ongoing safety of the children caught in the middle of their volatile relationship.
What makes this moment even more consequential is the history behind it: Bryan, 44, was already under a court order prohibiting contact with Cartwright due to a previous domestic violence case. His arrest for fourth-degree assault triggered an instant probation violation, leaving him jailed without bail. The legal stakes now stretch far beyond a single incident—this is a turning point that could reshape custody, sentencing, and the couple's future.
Deputies responded around 12:30 p.m. on Nov. 29 to reports of reckless endangering near a popular campground outside Lowell, Oregon. Investigators learned Bryan had exited the couple’s truck and was walking along the road when Cartwright allegedly attempted to run him over, ultimately crashing into a ditch with their three young children still inside. No injuries were reported.
The sheriff’s office stated that both adults showed signs of impairment, and witnesses were interviewed on scene. Crucially, Bryan was not permitted to be near Cartwright due to an existing no contact order tied to a prior domestic violence case. This turned his arrest into an immediate probation violation.
Cartwright was initially booked on a felony attempted assault charge, later cleared at arraignment, leaving six misdemeanor charges in place. Bryan remains held without bail until at least Dec. 3.
This case blends criminal law, domestic violence protections, probation enforcement, and child endangerment statutes. Cartwright’s charges—DUI, reckless driving, and reckless endangerment—require prosecutors to show that her conduct and impairment posed a real risk to others, especially with children present.
The no contact order issued Monday underscores judicial concern about the volatility between the parties. These orders are a standard protective measure when domestic violence history and potential ongoing risk overlap.
For Bryan, the legal jeopardy is anchored in probation rules. When someone on supervised probation makes prohibited contact or is implicated in new criminal conduct, courts must determine whether they violated conditions knowingly and whether that violation endangers others. Violations can result in immediate custody and re-sentencing based on the original conviction.
Upcoming steps include evidentiary review, pretrial scheduling, and probation violation hearings that will shape the trajectory of both cases.
Bryan could face jail time if the court finds a serious probation violation. Cartwright’s misdemeanor charges can also carry jail sentences, though outcomes often include probation or treatment requirements for first-time offenders.
Cartwright faces six misdemeanor counts: DUI, two counts of reckless endangerment, and three counts of reckless driving. Bryan faces fourth-degree assault tied directly to his probation status.
Deputies reported impairment indicators, a crash scene, and witness accounts. The strength of the case will depend on toxicology results and evidence confirmed during discovery.
Dismissal is unlikely without evidentiary issues or negotiated plea agreements. There is no indication prosecutors intend to drop the charges at this stage.
Misdemeanor DUI and endangerment cases typically unfold over several months. Probation violation proceedings move faster, meaning Bryan may face a judicial decision sooner.
This case illustrates how domestic violence protection orders work—and how seriously courts treat violations. Even consensual or accidental contact can trigger major legal consequences when a protective order is in place. It also shows how DUI and reckless endangerment charges become significantly more severe when children are present, as child safety is a central legal priority.
The incident also highlights how separate legal issues—probation, impairment, family safety—interlock in real time, resulting in swift judicial intervention.
Best-case scenario:
Cartwright completes treatment and probation programs while maintaining custody arrangements supervised by the court. Bryan resolves the violation with limited sanctions and enhanced monitoring.
Worst-case scenario:
Courts impose jail time for Cartwright, while Bryan faces a substantial re-sentencing on his underlying domestic violence conviction, alongside stricter long-term protective measures.
Most common outcome in similar cases:
Structured probation, mandated counselling, continued protective orders, restrictions on contact, and supervised parenting plans to ensure safety and minimise risk.
Are the children safe, and where are they now?
Deputies confirmed the children were placed with a family member immediately after the incident. Long-term arrangements will be addressed later by the court.
Is this related to Bryan’s previous domestic violence cases?
Yes. Bryan’s arrest violated an existing no contact order stemming from an earlier domestic violence case, intensifying his legal exposure.
Did anyone get hurt in the crash?
Deputies reported that no physical injuries occurred, including to the children inside the truck.
Could either of them regain contact soon?
Only if a judge modifies or lifts the protective order. For now, the no contact order remains in effect.
This case has become a high-stakes intersection of DUI law, domestic violence protections, and strict probation enforcement. With Cartwright facing six active charges and a court-ordered separation, and Bryan detained for violating an existing domestic violence probation order, both now sit in legally precarious positions. The next hearings will determine whether either party faces heightened penalties, modified custody arrangements, or extended supervision. The stakes—for their freedom, their children, and their long-term legal futures—remain significant.
👉 Latest: What Is Assault and Verbal Assault in the USA? 👈
Bilaal Salaam has filed a $3M civil lawsuit accusing Jada Pinkett Smith of threatening him during a 2021 confrontation and retaliating after he refused to assist with post-Oscars crisis management. The case now centres on alleged intimidation, emotional distress, and reputational harm, placing fresh legal scrutiny on one of Hollywood's most high-profile families.
Los Angeles was rocked this week by new court filings that thrust Jada Pinkett Smith into the centre of a high-stakes legal storm—one involving alleged threats, retaliation, and a decades-long friendship now in ruins.
According to a lawsuit filed on 7 November, Bilaal Salaam, who describes himself as Will Smith’s closest friend for nearly 40 years, claims Jada confronted him at Will’s 2021 birthday celebration at the Regency Calabasas Common and delivered a stark warning: stop sharing her personal information or “end up missing or catch a bullet.” He alleges she was flanked by members of her entourage, turning a private dispute into a moment of public intimidation.
Salaam says the confrontation escalated outside the venue when an associate followed him to his car, issuing further verbal threats. The legal stakes intensified, he claims, after he refused to help manage the fallout from Will Smith’s 2022 Oscars slap.
Here’s where the case takes a sharp turn: Salaam alleges a retaliatory campaign damaged his reputation, undermined his credibility, and left him isolated and afraid. With emotional distress, reputational destruction, and millions of dollars now on the line, the lawsuit places renewed legal pressure on one of Hollywood’s most scrutinised families.
Salaam alleges in his lawsuit that Jada confronted him during Will Smith’s birthday celebration on September 25, 2021, at the Regency Calabasas Common.
The lawsuit centres on a confrontation on 25 September 2021 at Will Smith’s birthday party. Salaam alleges Jada confronted him about sharing personal details and demanded he sign an NDA to stop discussing her private life.
He claims an associate continued threatening him as he left the venue. After Will Smith’s Oscars incident in 2022, Salaam alleges he was pressured to help with crisis management but refused due to what he describes as tasks he believed were “illegal, unethical, or morally compromising.”
Another major point involves Jada’s public denial to TMZ that she had ever seen Will engage in intimate behaviour with men. Salaam argues this denial harmed his credibility, especially after he released a video involving Will Smith and Alfonso Ribeiro. Ribeiro has never commented.
Representatives for Jada Pinkett Smith and Will Smith have not yet responded to the lawsuit.
Salaam’s lawsuit is a civil action rooted in claims of intentional infliction of emotional distress, reputational harm, and damages tied to alleged threats. In civil cases like this, courts focus on whether the behaviour was extreme, whether it caused severe emotional harm, and whether the plaintiff suffered measurable losses such as health deterioration, financial damage, or public ridicule.
Evidence that may be examined includes witness testimony, digital records, security footage, communications, and medical or financial documentation. California courts will also assess whether any alleged threats rise to the level of actionable misconduct in a civil context.
Procedurally, the case will now move toward responses from the defendants, followed by discovery, depositions, and pre-trial motions. Potential outcomes include dismissal, settlement, or a civil trial depending on how the evidence develops.
No. This is a civil lawsuit seeking financial damages. Civil filings cannot result in jail or criminal penalties.
There are no criminal charges. The central claims involve intentional infliction of emotional distress and reputational damage.
Only the plaintiff’s allegations are publicly available. Courts do not assess the strength of evidence until discovery reveals documents, testimony, and corroborating materials.
Yes. Civil cases can be dismissed if the court finds the claims legally insufficient or unsupported by evidence. This is a procedural determination—not a conclusion about truthfulness.
Similar civil disputes can last months or years depending on scheduling, motions, and whether the parties pursue settlement.
This case highlights how civil law distinguishes between harsh personal disputes and conduct that crosses into legally actionable intimidation or emotional distress. Courts look closely at context, severity, and documented harm—not just the words used.
It also underscores how NDAs operate. While common in Hollywood, an NDA must be voluntary; coercion can become legally relevant and may appear in evidence during litigation.
Finally, the lawsuit shows how public statements—such as denials or interviews—can have legal consequences if someone argues those comments damaged their reputation or implied they were dishonest.
Best-case scenario:
The dispute resolves through a confidential settlement, avoiding prolonged public escalation.
Worst-case scenario:
If the plaintiff substantiates his claims, the court could award significant damages and issue findings that further impact public perception of the defendants.
Most common outcome in similar civil cases:
Many cases settle after discovery clarifies what evidence each side can rely on, reducing uncertainty for both parties.
Does this lawsuit involve Will Smith directly?
No. Will Smith is not a named defendant in the current lawsuit, although aspects of the allegations relate to events surrounding him.
What does “emotional distress” legally cover?
Courts evaluate whether alleged conduct was extreme or outrageous and whether it caused serious emotional harm supported by evidence.
Could police become involved?
Only prosecutors can initiate criminal proceedings. This case is purely civil unless authorities independently determine criminal violations occurred.
Is a public denial enough to be considered harmful?
Not by itself. Courts look at intent, context, and measurable impact on reputation or livelihood.
The lawsuit against Jada Pinkett Smith marks a significant legal challenge involving allegations of threats, retaliation, and emotional distress. The case remains in its earliest phase, with no findings of fact and no response yet from the defendants.
The next major step will be formal responses and the start of discovery, a stage that often determines whether cases proceed, settle, or collapse. For now, the filing underscores how personal disputes can rapidly escalate into high-stakes civil litigation—especially when public reputation and multimillion-dollar damages are involved.
Related: 👉 Why Most People Misunderstand Defamation — And What the Law Actually Protects 👈
Simon Jordan’s return to a Crystal Palace match highlights long-standing tensions from the club’s post-administration era and ongoing questions about leadership stability.
Simon Jordan will attend a Crystal Palace match in person this weekend for the first time since leaving the club in 2010. The former owner said on talkSPORT that he will be at Craven Cottage for Sunday’s Premier League meeting with Fulham. He plans to take his son to his first live game. Jordan has avoided attending Palace fixtures since the club was sold during administration and a new ownership group led by Steve Parish took charge.
The return is notable because Jordan remains a minority shareholder and a regular commentator on Premier League governance. His remarks come during a period in which clubs face tighter financial controls and close scrutiny of managerial contracts. The development also draws attention to how former owners re-engage with clubs once operational control has shifted.
Jordan bought Palace in 2000 and oversaw a decade that included promotion in 2004. The club later returned to the Championship and entered administration in 2010. That process paved the way for the CPFC 2010 consortium, which remains in charge today.
He has stayed away from matches due to personal distance from the current ownership. His comments suggested the decision was based on circumstances around the handover rather than ongoing events.
Jordan said he now wants to introduce his son to live football. This marks a shift from years of following the club only through media coverage.
The reopening of this chapter comes in a league that operates under far higher revenues than during Jordan’s tenure. Central distributions more than doubled over the past decade, reshaping expectations around investment.
Jordan built his wealth in the 1990s through a mobile-phone retail chain called The Pocket Phone Shop. The business was sold around 2000 for about £73 million, earning Jordan roughly £36.5 million.
Shortly afterwards he paid an estimated £10 million to acquire Crystal Palace, becoming the club’s chairman at 32. Over the following decade he invested heavily in the club. By 2010, financial pressure — including delayed wages, mounting debt and a failed attempt to find new buyers — led Palace into administration.
At that point, Jordan was listed as the club’s largest creditor, owed about £20 million. The club subsequently passed to a new ownership group and his control ended.
Jordan is returning at a time when the club and league operate in a very different financial landscape.
Crystal Palace have not issued any comment on Jordan’s planned attendance. There is no indication of any meeting or engagement between him and the club.
Supporters have reacted mainly through curiosity, noting Jordan’s media presence and the length of his absence. Online discussion has focused on the historical context and what his return symbolises rather than expectations of change.
The reaction also sits within a wider conversation about Palace’s direction under the current ownership, which has guided the club through long Premier League spells and infrastructure upgrades.
Public response has focused on the symbolism of the moment rather than immediate club implications.
Jordan’s presence at a match may attract attention among supporters who follow his commentary on player sales, budgeting, and governance. His remarks also intersect with ongoing debate over Premier League profit and sustainability rules, which influence transfer strategies for mid-table clubs.
Compared with 2010, Palace now operate in a far more stable commercial environment. The club benefit from global broadcasting deals that far exceed the values of the mid-2000s.
The situation also reflects a broader media trend in which former executives maintain influence through broadcasting rather than direct involvement. This model shapes how supporters understand behind-the-scenes decisions.
Jordan’s return intersects with changing revenue models and growing media roles for former owners.
Premier League financial reports show total distributions climbing significantly since the early 2010s. This has increased pressure on clubs to demonstrate clear spending strategies and transparent decision-making.
By contrast, UEFA’s financial landscape has changed at a slower pace, which has strengthened the Premier League’s commercial position. Clubs like Palace now compete in a system driven more by long-term planning and data-led recruitment.
Rising league revenues have expanded expectations around financial management and managerial support.
Fulham vs Crystal Palace will be shown live in the UK on Sky Sports. Streaming is available through Sky Go for subscribers.
In the United States, the match will air on NBC Sports platforms. Optus Sport will broadcast it in Australia, while DAZN holds rights in several European territories.
Highlights will appear on official Premier League digital channels. There is no confirmed free-to-air broadcast in the UK.
Access varies by region, with Sky Sports carrying the match in the UK.
Jordan has said he kept his distance due to the circumstances surrounding the club’s administration and transition to new ownership. He described it as a personal boundary rather than an ongoing dispute.
Yes. Jordan retains a minority shareholding, but he does not have an executive role. Palace’s operations are managed by the current ownership group.
He suggested that Glasner may leave at the end of the season because he has not signed a new contract. Jordan linked his view to the club’s transfer activity and expectations around squad investment.
No. The club have not publicly acknowledged his attendance or made any related comment.
Palace sit in the top half of the table, but the standings may change due to upcoming fixtures, including a midweek match at Burnley.
Jordan is expected to attend Sunday’s match without any formal engagement with the club. Palace will continue a run of fixtures that may influence their league position and discussions around managerial planning.
There have been no updates on Glasner’s contract. The club have not commented on renewal negotiations or timelines.
Jordan’s return highlights how former owners navigate their relationship with clubs after major transitions. It also shows how financial growth and regulatory pressure have reshaped expectations across the Premier League. Supporters are watching both the symbolic moment and its broader backdrop: long-term planning, managerial clarity, and stability. The key issue going forward is how Palace manage these pressures amid a competitive and commercially demanding league.
The match will take place at Craven Cottage in west London. Kick-off is set for 2pm on Sunday.
Sky Sports will broadcast the game live in the UK on its Premier League channel. Subscribers can stream it through Sky Go on mobile devices, tablets or smart TVs.
Viewers without a Sky subscription can watch via the NOW streaming service with a day or month membership. International coverage will follow regional Premier League rights, with NBC Sports carrying the match in the United States and Optus Sport showing it in Australia.
Craven Cottage remains one of the league’s smallest stadiums, so away allocations are limited and tickets for this fixture are sold out.
📣 Gary Lineker Lands Multi-Million-Pound Netflix Deal for 2026 World Cup Podcast
Saudi Pro League interest in Mohamed Salah and other European stars signals intensified competition for elite football talent.
Fresh reporting from talkSPORT indicates that Saudi Pro League clubs have revived their effort to sign Liverpool forward Mohamed Salah, despite the 33-year-old previously rejecting a historic offer reportedly worth around £500 million before extending his Liverpool contract.
The renewed interest follows Salah’s recent drop in form and his benching during Liverpool’s 2–0 win at West Ham. Additional updates include Saudi discussions regarding Real Madrid’s Vinícius Júnior, uncertainty surrounding Bournemouth manager Andoni Iraola’s contract, and transfer pressures affecting Manchester United’s Manuel Ugarte and Manchester City goalkeeper James Trafford.
The developments underline Saudi Arabia’s continuing push to secure high-profile players, reshaping market conditions across Europe. For Premier League and La Liga clubs, the revived approaches affect squad stability, contract negotiations and planning for the 2025–26 season. Fans, broadcasters and international audiences face potential changes in league dynamics if multiple major players move during the next transfer window.
Saudi clubs remain committed to targeting Salah, with Al Hilal widely viewed as the leading contender and Al-Qadsiah also expressing interest.
Salah previously declined a major Saudi offer and instead agreed to a two-year contract extension with Liverpool.
Liverpool benched Salah for the 2–0 win over West Ham after a period of reduced form compared with last season.
Saudi negotiators are also exploring a package for Vinícius Júnior aimed at making him one of the world’s highest-paid players.
Bournemouth manager Andoni Iraola has not yet agreed to extend his contract, consistent with his preference for shorter-term deals.
Manchester United are preparing a midfield overhaul that could result in Manuel Ugarte leaving the club after limited appearances.
Manchester City goalkeeper James Trafford is seeking more game time after losing his spot due to Gigi Donnarumma’s arrival.
Liverpool have made no new public comments on Salah’s future beyond his current contract.
Supporters remain divided, with some prioritising stability and others recognising the financial opportunity of a future sale.
Real Madrid have not issued statements regarding links between Vinícius Júnior and Saudi clubs.
Bournemouth fans have voiced concern over the uncertainty surrounding Iraola’s long-term status.
Saudi Pro League investment is continuing to reshape transfer norms, increasing wage expectations and influencing contract negotiations across Europe.
Salah’s previous offer, among the largest publicly reported in football, highlights the scale of the financial shift affecting top-tier players.
Player departures or major bids could alter club strategies, broadcast narratives and global viewer interest during upcoming seasons.
International broadcasters and streaming platforms closely track transfer-linked players due to their impact on audience engagement.
FIFA’s most recent global transfer reports show sustained growth in spending from Asian confederation clubs, aligning with the current escalation in Saudi interest. Historical data from FIFA and UEFA indicates similar market inflation during previous periods of multi-league competition for marquee players.
Premier League and La Liga fixtures remain available through regional broadcast partners and official streaming services.
Supporters can follow transfer developments via club announcements, verified press conferences and established outlets such as BBC Sport, Sky Sports and FIFA channels.
Free updates are available through club websites, X/Twitter feeds, YouTube highlights and matchday coverage from authorised broadcasters.
There is no confirmed movement. Liverpool have not indicated any intention to sell, and all current reports point only to renewed Saudi interest rather than active negotiations.
Al Hilal remains the primary club linked with Salah, while Al-Qadsiah has also shown interest. These links reflect the league’s wider strategy of acquiring internationally recognised forwards.
Reporting suggests preparatory legal work on a potential Saudi package, but Real Madrid have not confirmed any discussions or signalled willingness to negotiate.
Ugarte has had limited minutes this season and was part of broader criticism of the midfield’s performance. A rebuild makes outgoings more likely.
Trafford’s chances have been limited following Donnarumma’s arrival. Consistent playing time is important for his England squad ambitions.
Clubs will continue reviewing transfer priorities as the next window approaches.
Liverpool, Real Madrid, Manchester United and Manchester City are expected to reassess squad needs closer to summer.
Bournemouth must determine Iraola’s future before finalising next season’s planning.
Official updates will likely increase around the opening of the transfer period.
Saudi Arabia’s ongoing push for elite footballers continues to influence global transfer economics.
Premier League and La Liga clubs face real strategic implications as major offers and player interest reshape contract landscapes.
Supporters and broadcasters should monitor official announcements from clubs and governing bodies.
The upcoming transfer window will clarify whether these renewed approaches translate into confirmed moves.
📣 Gary Lineker Lands Multi-Million-Pound Netflix Deal for 2026 World Cup Podcast
Gary Lineker will host his podcast The Rest Is Football on Netflix during the 2026 FIFA World Cup, reaching millions of UK and international viewers.
The Event
Gary Lineker has signed a multi-million-pound deal with Netflix to host his podcast, The Rest Is Football, during the 2026 FIFA World Cup. The tournament will take place from June 11 to July 19 across the United States, Canada, and Mexico. This follows Lineker’s departure from the BBC earlier in 2025.
Why It Matters
The move marks a major shift in sports media, with a high-profile presenter leaving free-to-air broadcasting for a subscription-based streaming platform. It affects both UK audiences accustomed to BBC coverage and international viewers, and illustrates the growing influence of streaming services in global sports coverage.
Lineker’s podcast will air daily during the World Cup, up from three episodes per week.
Co-hosts Alan Shearer and Micah Richards will join Lineker throughout the tournament.
The deal is reported to dwarf Lineker’s previous BBC contract, where he earned £1.35 million annually for presenting Match of the Day.
His production company, Goalhanger, negotiated the licensing rights, with Netflix expanding its podcasting efforts internationally.
The BBC acknowledged Lineker’s departure and highlighted his 25-year contribution, confirming he will not receive a final payout.
Fans have discussed the move on social media, focusing on the multi-million-pound value and the switch to a streaming platform.
Netflix has not released specific viewership projections or episode schedules beyond the tournament.
UK viewers will need a Netflix subscription to access the daily episodes, unlike previous free BBC coverage.
International audiences will gain broader access, with Netflix distributing the podcast globally.
The deal also signals a trend toward subscription-based coverage of major sports events, potentially changing how fans engage with the World Cup.
Media reports indicate this is one of the largest hosting contracts for a UK football presenter in recent decades.
Lineker’s daily show format, combined with international distribution, represents a notable expansion of his audience beyond traditional BBC viewers.
This multi-million-pound contract sets a benchmark for future sports broadcasting deals.
Netflix will host The Rest Is Football during the tournament.
Official episode schedules will be published on Netflix and the podcast’s social media channels.
Free coverage remains available through FIFA-licensed broadcasters.
Episodes are expected daily from June 11 to July 19, 2026, replacing the previous tri-weekly schedule.
Alan Shearer and Micah Richards will join Lineker for tournament coverage.
Following his BBC departure in 2025, Lineker’s podcast became available for licensing to Netflix, allowing international distribution.
A Netflix subscription is required, though some prior episodes remain on Spotify and YouTube.
Reports suggest the multi-million-pound deal surpasses Lineker’s BBC salary and is among the highest for UK football presenters in recent decades.
Netflix is expected to announce official launch dates and schedules ahead of the tournament.
Promotional campaigns will align with the World Cup kickoff on June 11.
The BBC will continue independent tournament coverage under separate media agreements.
Gary Lineker’s move to Netflix represents a major shift in sports broadcasting, with a multi-million-pound deal that affects viewing accessibility and fan engagement. Both UK and international audiences should monitor Netflix for schedules and co-host appearances. The deal reflects broader trends in subscription-based sports media and the increasing global reach of football content.
Prairie Farms recalled select fat-free milk after detecting possible contamination with food-grade cleaning agents, triggering FDA oversight and renewed scrutiny of food-safety controls.
Prairie Farms has issued a voluntary recall of specific fat-free milk products after identifying potential contamination with food-grade cleaning agents during internal quality checks.
The affected milk was produced at the company’s Iowa facility and distributed to Woodman’s retail locations in Illinois and Wisconsin.
The issue surfaced on November 24, when routine monitoring flagged a deviation in production. The central legal concern involves whether the affected batch met federal food-safety and sanitation requirements before entering the retail supply chain.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration is the authority overseeing the recall, providing public guidance and assessing compliance obligations. This matter carries public-safety significance because contaminated dairy products can expose consumers to avoidable health risks. It also underscores the importance of regulatory oversight, manufacturer duty-of-care and timely intervention when food-quality concerns arise within the production process.
Prairie Farms confirmed that approximately 320 gallons of the affected fat-free milk were sold before the recall was issued. The product can be identified by the code date DEC08, plant code PLT19-145, production window 17:51–21:23 and UPC 7273023117.
The company reported that the potential contaminant was a food-grade sanitising agent used in cleaning equipment and food-contact surfaces. While intended for hygiene control, it is not suitable for consumption. No illnesses have been reported.
The recalled milk was distributed exclusively to Woodman’s stores in Illinois and Wisconsin. Consumers who purchased the product were advised to discard it or return it for a refund in accordance with standard FDA recall procedures.
Food-safety law requires manufacturers to prevent adulterated products from entering the marketplace. Under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA), sanitation, preventive controls and quality-assurance checks must ensure that food is safe for human consumption.
Regulators typically evaluate whether production controls, cleaning cycles and hazard-prevention protocols aligned with federal standards at the time the batch was processed. When contaminants cannot be ruled out, agencies generally classify the affected product as potentially adulterated.
Retailers must also follow recall instructions, remove impacted items and implement consumer-notification procedures. These obligations form part of the wider regulatory framework governing the distribution of potentially unsafe food products.
👉👉 Can You Sue Over a Recalled Product? Know Your Rights 👈👈
WHO and Codex Alimentarius food-safety guidelines emphasise consumer protection and prevention of exposure to contaminated products. Even when contamination involves food-grade substances, the principle of avoiding avoidable risk remains central to public-health standards.
OSCE rule-of-law principles reinforce the need for transparent oversight mechanisms that mitigate harm and ensure accountability within supply chains. Timely recalls and regulatory monitoring demonstrate due diligence in preventing public exposure.
Food recalls can also influence community confidence in production standards. Ensuring that manufacturers promptly identify and address deviations is essential for maintaining trust in food-safety systems.
The FDA oversees recall classification, determines the scope of affected batches and reviews production and sanitisation records. Its process typically includes examination of digital logs, batch data and sanitation documentation to verify compliance.
State agriculture or public-health departments may support distribution checks to ensure retailers remove affected products. Prosecutors become involved only when evidence indicates potential violations of federal food-safety law, which is not indicated in this case.
International coordination is not expected because the recalled products were distributed domestically.
Potential ingestion of cleaning agents may cause gastrointestinal symptoms, prompting precautionary measures even where no illnesses are reported. Rapid recall action helps limit exposure and supports risk mitigation.
Incidents like this highlight the importance of strong preventive controls within food-production systems. Manufacturers and regulators typically use such events to reassess procedures, ensure corrective actions and reinforce compliance standards.
Public confidence in food-safety frameworks depends on transparent recalls and effective oversight. Ensuring that deviations are managed quickly helps safeguard consumers and maintain trust in regulatory processes.
The affected product has the DEC08 code date, plant code PLT19-145, production window 17:51–21:23 and UPC 7273023117. Only these specified items are part of the recall.
These sanitising solutions are designed for equipment cleaning, not consumption. Ingestion can cause stomach upset or irritation, and regulators advise discarding affected products to avoid potential symptoms.
Distribution records show that the affected batch was shipped only to Woodman’s locations in Illinois and Wisconsin. Other states did not receive the impacted lot.
Any contamination risk, even without confirmed illness, requires assessment of sanitation controls, preventive measures and compliance with federal food-safety protocols.
Regulators typically continue reviewing batch records, sanitation logs and process-control data to determine if the issue was isolated. Prairie Farms may be required to document corrective actions or update preventive controls.
The FDA monitors for consumer reports of illness and may issue further updates if necessary. Retailers will complete removal of remaining stock and manage refunds in accordance with recall procedures.
Once compliance documentation is reviewed, regulators determine whether any additional steps are required to prevent recurrence.
A product is adulterated if it contains substances not intended for consumption or is produced under conditions that could make it unsafe.
Yes. Batch data, timestamps and sanitation records are routinely examined during recall assessments.
FSMA emphasises preventive controls and requires manufacturers to identify hazards and implement processes to minimise contamination risks.
The Prairie Farms recall highlights how U.S. food-safety systems operate when potential contaminants are detected. Although no illnesses have been reported, the incident demonstrates the importance of preventive controls, rapid removal of affected products and coordinated regulatory oversight. Public safety depends on manufacturers identifying deviations early and regulators verifying that corrective measures meet federal standards. Ongoing diligence remains essential to maintaining trust in the food-supply chain.
Samsung has officially taken the next step in foldable design, introducing the Galaxy Z TriFold — its first device with a triple-hinge, multi-fold architecture. The company is launching the phone in South Korea on December 12, with international rollouts following through early 2026, including a U.S. release in the first quarter. The debut comes as rivals — particularly Chinese brands — move aggressively into the premium foldable space.
Samsung positions the TriFold as both a technology showcase and a strategic preview of where its flagship mobile design may be heading.
The Galaxy Z TriFold is Samsung’s first device to bring three folding panels together in a single consumer-ready product. When fully expanded, the device opens into a 10-inch display with a 2160 × 1584 resolution — a format that’s closer to a compact tablet than a stretched-out smartphone. It’s slightly smaller than Apple’s current 11-inch iPad but intentionally more portable.
To achieve this, Samsung uses twin inward-folding hinges, allowing the device to collapse into a rectangular shape that measures 12.9 mm thick when folded. That’s marginally thicker than the Galaxy Z Fold6 but noticeably slimmer than the first generation of tri-fold prototypes shown in recent years by various manufacturers.
Internally, Samsung includes 16GB of RAM and 512GB of storage, packaged into a single configuration priced at ₩3,594,000 ($2,449).
A hands-on demonstration shows the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold fully expanded, revealing its triple-hinge 10-inch display at the Seoul launch event.
The timing is not accidental. Samsung has dominated the early years of the foldable category, but the landscape has shifted quickly. Chinese manufacturers — including Huawei, Honor and others — have released thinner, lighter foldables that have begun to pressure Samsung’s long-held lead.
According to Liz Lee, Associate Director at Counterpoint Research, the Galaxy Z TriFold is not designed to ship at mass scale. Instead, it acts as a pilot device, allowing Samsung to refine hinge durability, test new UI modes, and observe how different markets respond before committing to wider production.
Lee also notes that Apple’s expected entry into the foldable segment in 2026 has accelerated competitive timelines. Samsung’s approach appears to be: show the engineering capability now, refine aggressively, and set the narrative before Apple stakes its claim.
While few outside Samsung have tested the TriFold extensively, the company spotlighted several features during its media demonstration in Seoul:
Open fully, the device’s 10-inch panel becomes a workspace for multitasking, content editing, and entertainment. The resolution isn’t pushing extremes, but the screen real estate is the real story.
Users can run three apps vertically, side by side — something no current Fold, Flip, or slab-style phone can replicate at this scale.
Samsung demonstrated a DeX-style interface that can be activated without an external display, turning the TriFold into a portable micro-workstation.
Samsung says this is its largest battery ever fitted into a foldable. Super-fast charging reportedly reaches 50% in 30 minutes, though exact wattage numbers were not disclosed.
Samsung has confirmed the following rollout plan:
South Korea: December 12, 2025
China, Taiwan, Singapore, UAE: late December through early January
United States: Q1 2026 (specific date to be announced)
Only one model will ship globally — black, 16GB/512GB — positioning it securely at the premium end of the foldable market.
Counterpoint’s Liz Lee says the TriFold is primarily a real-world testing platform. The objective isn’t high-volume sales — it’s data gathering. Samsung wants to measure:
hinge fatigue over time
user demand for a three-panel workflow
whether consumers treat the device like a primary phone, a tablet replacement, or something in between
This approach mirrors Samsung’s earlier strategy with the first Galaxy Fold in 2019: lead with engineering, learn from early adopters, and refine quickly.
Huawei recently released its second-generation tri-fold model in China, measuring 12.8 mm when folded — roughly in line with Samsung’s thickness. However, due to geopolitical constraints, its international availability remains limited.
Honor, now independent from Huawei, continues to target international markets with competitively priced foldables that challenge Samsung’s designs and dimensions.
Where Samsung maintains an advantage is ecosystem consistency. Despite the new hinge architecture, the TriFold supports Samsung’s existing app optimisations, cloud sync tools, and accessory compatibility.
The Galaxy Z TriFold is clearly not intended for mainstream buyers — at least not yet. Its high price, limited launch volume, and experimental hinge design position it closer to a technology preview than a mass-market flagship.
However, early adopters and productivity-focused users may find it compelling, especially if Samsung delivers on durability. For everyone else, the more polished successors expected in 2026–27 may be the devices worth waiting for.
It’s Samsung’s first triple-hinge foldable smartphone, expanding into a 10-inch display and closing down into a more compact rectangular form.
Samsung says the U.S. release is scheduled for the first quarter of 2026, with full details to come.
Samsung says durability testing is ongoing. The device uses two inward hinges designed for repeated folding, but long-term performance will depend on real-world usage.
The phone launches at ₩3,594,000 (~$2,449) for the 16GB/512GB model.
Samsung’s Galaxy Z TriFold marks a significant moment in the foldable market. While still experimental in many ways, it signals the next phase of smartphone evolution — where portability, screen size and productivity blend into a single adaptive device. With Apple’s expected entry imminent and Chinese brands accelerating their own efforts, 2026 is shaping up to be the most competitive year yet for foldables.
👉 Further Reading: CNBC – Samsung Launches Its First Multi-Folding Smartphone 👈
Slot says neither summer signing is ready for three full matches, raising key selection questions for Liverpool’s busiest week of the season.
Liverpool manager Arne Slot has admitted that Alexander Isak and Florian Wirtz are not yet capable of completing three full matches in a week — a reality that could shape team selection during one of the club’s most demanding stretches of the Premier League season.
Speaking ahead of Wednesday’s trip to Sunderland, Slot confirmed that both big-money summer signings are still being managed carefully after recent fitness setbacks. Wirtz, who impressed with 75 minutes in the win over West Ham, is still building sharpness after missing two games, while Isak reported cramp after scoring his first league goal for the club since his £125m arrival.
With three Premier League fixtures in seven days, Slot faces a balancing act that could determine how Liverpool navigate a period that may prove pivotal to their campaign.
Slot made it clear that neither player is at the stage where they can play “three times 90 minutes”, calling the fixture schedule “almost impossible” to manage with so many players returning from injury.
Wirtz: missed nearly two weeks of training; still being eased back
Isak: experiencing early-stage cramp; minutes to be monitored
Gomez: played first full league match in 11 months and still under observation
“They are not able to play three times 90, that is for sure,” Slot said. “Now I have to wait and see how they feel today, if they are able to play from the start again.”
The comments suggest that Liverpool may need to rotate more aggressively than anticipated, especially with back-to-back games at Anfield and Elland Road.
This week’s fixtures — Sunderland (A) and Leeds (A) — arrive at a difficult moment for Liverpool’s squad depth.
Neither Isak nor Wirtz will start all three games
Slot could deploy one from the bench in midweek
Joe Gomez may not complete another 90 minutes
Ben Doak or Cody Gakpo could see increased roles
Wataru Endo may be rotated due to workload
Slot suggested that all three players could be involved “if they don’t get an injury”, but “involved” may not mean starting.
In a boost, Slot confirmed that Conor Bradley has rejoined team training, although he warned fans not to expect an immediate return.
“Conor got into a training session yesterday for the first time,” Slot said. “He’s not everything 100% so we have to manage that.”
Bradley could be available for Leeds on Saturday if he responds well to sessions in the coming days.
Meanwhile, Jeremie Frimpong — out since October with a hamstring problem — is expected back in training next week but will miss at least three more games.
The club enters a decisive stretch where:
Each point is critical in the title race
Squad rotation could dictate January transfer priorities
Fan scrutiny of Slot’s decisions will intensify
Performance levels may expose gaps in fitness planning
This period also represents the first time Slot’s Liverpool has faced an authentic “three-games-in-seven-days” test with multiple returning players.
How he distributes minutes across Isak, Wirtz, Gomez, and Szoboszlai may influence the rest of the season.
Predicted Liverpool XI (4-3-3): Alisson; Kerkez, Van Dijk, Konate, Szoboszlai; Mac Allister, Gravenberch, Jones; Gakpo, Ekitike, Salah
Injured: Bradley, Frimpong, Leoni
Time and date: 8.15pm GMT on Wednesday December 3, 2025
Venue: Anfield
How to watch: Sky Sports
Wirtz and Isak likely to feature from the bench unless they come through training at full intensity.
| Player | Status | Expected Return |
|---|---|---|
| Florian Wirtz | Managing load | Available, limited minutes |
| Alexander Isak | Minor cramp | Available, limited minutes |
| Joe Gomez | Returning from long layoff | Available with monitoring |
| Conor Bradley | Back in training | Could return vs Leeds |
| Jeremie Frimpong | Hamstring injury | Back in training next week |
| Andy Robertson | Fit | Available |
| Trent Alexander-Arnold | Fit | Available |
Not yet. Isak is available but is not considered ready to complete three full matches in a week.
Slot has not confirmed, but his comments suggest Wirtz may be rotated or given reduced minutes.
Bradley has rejoined team training and could return for the Leeds match if his recovery continues smoothly.
At least three more, according to Slot.
Liverpool’s week now hinges on Slot’s rotation. Managing Isak’s and Wirtz’s workloads while protecting Gomez may determine how many points Liverpool emerge with — and how stable their squad looks heading into the year-end stretch.
Liverpool face Sunderland on Wednesday, 3 December 2025, with kick-off scheduled for 20:15 (UK time).
The match will be broadcast live on Sky Sports Premier League and Sky Sports Main Event, with coverage beginning around an hour before kick-off.
A live stream will also be available via Sky Go for subscribers.
Fans outside the UK can watch through the Premier League’s international broadcast partners, which vary by region. Common platforms include:
NBC Sports / Peacock (USA)
DAZN (Canada, some European territories)
Optus Sport (Australia)
SuperSport (Africa)
Star+ / ESPN (South America)
Supporters can check the Premier League’s official website for full regional listings.
👉 Further Reading: Sky Sports – Liverpool vs Sunderland Match Centre 👈
