Understand Your Rights. Solve Your Legal Problems
In this article we hear from Jacqueline Waihenya, a highly experienced lawyer and ADR specialist, on how the ADR climate is changing in Kenya.
ADR was formally entrenched in our Constitution, 2010 in Article 159(2)(c) as a principle for exercising judicial authority in Kenya, which laid a constitutional foundation for arbitration and mediation that allowed courts to sanction their use within the court system.
Prior to this, arbitration was practiced in Kenya as an alternative to litigation per the Arbitration Act, 1995 (amended in 2009) based largely on the UNCITRAL Model Law. It was and remains the most prevalent ADR mechanism in commercial disputes. Later on, mediation was introduced as a court-annexed practice in 2012 via our Civil Procedure Act. However, the first cohort of court-annexed mediators were accredited by the Judiciary in 2016. I was accredited as No.005.
However, within Kenyan culture ADR remains widely practiced informally and primarily through negotiation and mediation, especially at family, religious and community levels. Before court accreditation I therefore practiced as a mediator from 2012 and did substantial pro bono work at FIDA Kenya, a female advocate organisation that champions women’s rights. This familiarity with mediation explains its acceptance and uptake in the more formal settings. Parties also appreciate their ability to have a greater say and increased control in the outcome of their cases.
Act No.12 of 2012 introduced mediation into our civil procedure process. It defined mediation as an informal and non-adversarial process where an impartial mediator encourages and facilitates the resolution of a dispute between two or more parties and it specifically excluded sitting judges from being considered mediators.
The Act further created a Mediation Accreditation Committee which certifies, accredits and trains mediators. It is this pool of mediators that become eligible to be appointed to mediate matters under the Court-Annexed Mediation program. Initially the pilot program was confined to Nairobi, the capital city, but mediation has since been devolved around the country to different stations with remarkable success.
The other development which indirectly arose from this Act is the emergence of a number of specialised tribunals which have been brought into force via statute. Examples include the Tax Appeals Tribunal, Sports Tribunal and Energy Tribunal. These pieces of legislation also bear strong provisions empowering Tribunals to adopt ADR in their processes, although they are yet to be harmonised and realised practically.
Within Kenyan culture ADR remains widely practiced informally and primarily through negotiation and mediation, especially at family, religious and community levels.
Though the High Court retains a supervisory role over mediation, arbitration and specialised tribunals, recent developments strongly point towards an entrenchment of the doctrine of exhaustion of primary jurisdiction. It is commendable that our courts by and large support the entrenchment of ADR.
One of the most enduring effects of recognising ADR within the judicial process is that formalisation institutionalisation has provided great advocacy, particularly for mediation and arbitration. Prior to 2016, ADR in Kenya was synonymous with arbitration and was applied mostly within commercial circles for its traditional benefits – that is, it is confidential, lends itself to specialised commercial needs, is generally quicker than litigation and is enforceable as a court judgment.
After 2016, mediation was introduced for commercial cases and cases in the family division, and the increase in demand was immediate. Initially, most mediators were absorbed by the Court-Annexed Mediation program as a secondary profession. However, in due time, a number turned to mediation as their primary profession.
Since then, mediation has experienced a higher than average growth and mediation outfits have turned to ply their trade privately. Insofar as arbitration is concerned, the number of arbitrators has definitely increased and in the ‘State of ADR’ research carried out by the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators, Kenya recorded a trajectory of growth in 2021. These are outright indicators that client demand for ADR services has increased.
Court-Annexed Mediation registers the highest rates of adoption within the family division and these are divided into Children Cases, Matrimonial Property and Probate. In Kenya, divorce mediation is expressly prohibited as conniving, condoning or consenting to a divorce is not allowed under our laws. Commercial mediation has further attracted high-value claims which have been resolved within a fraction of the time that was previously spent on the dispute resolution process. A new area that has also registered significant success is the employment and labour division.
Arbitration remains the most demanded ADR mechanism for commercial disputes. The case of construction disputes is bifurcated as a good number of standard form contracts also provide for construction adjudication prior to the appointment of an arbitrator.
The general attitude towards ADR methods in Kenya is favourable. They resonate with the cultural frameworks of the country and their gradual recognition as formal methods of dispute resolution has enabled strong and decisive dispute resolution stakeholder engagements at the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators Kenya and likeminded institutions such as the Nairobi Centre for International Arbitration (NCIA). These organisations have been enabled to better engage with the judiciary, led by successive chief justices as well as the attorney generals of the country since the promulgation of the Constitution.
Insofar as arbitration is concerned, the number of arbitrators has definitely increased
The judiciary has in fact been the frontrunner in the deepening of mediation. Today, mediation and ADR are recognised by the judiciary as a strong pillar of social transformation in the dispensation of justice.
Having been a member of the National Steering Committee that steered the National ADR Policy which was recently approved by the Kenyan Cabinet I believe that our country’s attitude is positive and we can expect that the practice of mediation, arbitration and construction adjudication will be further streamlined and enhanced.
Kenyan law favours the traditional facilitative mediation model, which can be gleaned from the definition adopted by Act No.12 of 2012. Practically all training institutions train mediators using this model, and where mediators have departed from this in resolving disputes this has formed the basis for challenge in courts. As such, evaluative mediation is not encouraged. Personally, I aim for transformative mediation models where possible, as this lends itself to long-term resolution. In the majority of mediations that I have handled, the time constraint has demanded a facilitative approach.
As Vice Chairperson of the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators Kenya Branch I chaired a taskforce which brought together the mediating community in our first CIARB Mediation Conference in October 2022 under the theme: ‘The Coming of Age for Mediation: Encounter from Africa’. This attracted over 200 delegates in addition to speakers and representation from the Kenyan judiciary, academics, CIARB, NCIA, mediating institutions and individuals from Kenya, Uganda, Rwanda, Tanzania and the UK. The Law Society of Kenya and East Africa Law Society were also present. It provided a platform to share experiences and discuss emerging issues.
I was introduced to arbitration during my pupillage from the perspective of counsel and as they say, one tends to follow in the footsteps of their pupil masters. However, it took me over a decade of practice to take the plunge and acquire formal introduction into arbitration and then mediation and construction adjudication in quick succession. As most ADR professionals will confess, that initial immersion was like a breadth of fresh air. It took determination to unlearn many of the sins that litigation lawyers tend to acquire in the course of adversarial practice, and the journey has been one of self-reflection compounded by the varied responses that I have received from parties depending on the type of ADR at hand.
[ymal]
Today, I am a Chartered Arbitrator (CIARB), Chartered Mediator (ICMC) and Certified Advanced Construction Adjudicator (CIARB) living the multi-door dispute resolution dream. I have undertaken practical training with FIDIC at Kings College London and locally in Kenya and I am at the tail end of a second LLM master’s degree in International Dispute Resolution. As a neutral in arbitration, mediation and construction adjudication I have had the opportunity to resolve disputes that have been international or domestic in nature.
I believe that each dispute lends itself to a suitable dispute resolution mechanism and I have therefore taken the time to consistently increase my knowledge in arbitration, mediation and construction adjudication. In this way, I equip myself with the right set of tools to engage the appropriate dispute resolution mechanism for each dispute at hand. My journey so far has taken me to the International Mediation Institute (IMI) where I am a Certified Mediator and more recently to the inaugural FIFA Accredited Mediators.
I have had a great opportunity to have a front row seat to the ADR that works and I continue to mediate and adjudicate. I have also had several opportunities to engage in scholarship in mediation, construction adjudication and arbitration by writing articles as well as organising and addressing domestic and international conferences and workshops on the same.
Jacqueline Waihenya, Managing Partner
Moi Avenue, Jubilee Arcade, Third Floor – Office Suite No.13, Mombasa, Kenya
Jacqueline Waihenya is an advocate of the High Court of Kenya and managing partner of JWM Law LLP. Jacqueline is an ADR Expert and a Chartered Arbitrator of the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators (C.ARB/FCIARB), an International Federation of Consulting Engineers FIDIC Legal Professional and a member of the Dispute Resolution Board Foundation (DBRF). She is also a member of the Adjudication Society (London) and its Women in Adjudication branch.
JWM Law LLP is a full service corporate law firm based in Kenya. The firm’s staff handle a wide array of litigation, alternative dispute resolution, corporate governance and other legal matters. The firm also closely monitor events and trends and has developed a strategic sense for their dynamics and direction.
Ortoli Rosenstadt LLP represented Lichen China Limited on its $16 million listing on the Nasdaq Stock Market.
Lichen China Limited is a specialised taxation and financial service provider based in China. It has now announced the closing of its initial public offering (IPO) of 4,000,000 Class A ordinary shares at a public price of $4 per share. Trading of these Class A ordinary shares on the Nasdaq Capital Market began on 6 February 2023 under the ticker symbol “LICN”.
Ortoli Rosenstadt LLP advised Lichen China Limited with a team including Jason Ye (Partner and Co-Chair of Asia Practice), Yarona L Yieh (Counsel), Grace Bai (Associate) and Crystal Hsu (Associate).
Lichen China Limited, through its operating subsidiaries, is one of the leading financial and taxation service providers in China. They have operated as a dedicated financial and taxation solution service specialist in China for over 18 years, focusing on providing (i) financial and taxation solution services; (ii) education support services; and (iii) software and maintenance services in China. Leveraging their relationships with numerous local educational institutions, their expertise in the financial and taxation solution services market and experience in developing financial and taxation training and analysis software, the company also offers software product to enterprise customers, universities, colleges and educational institutes.
Lichen’s IPO was significant in a sense that it was the first small-cap IPO by a China-based issuer to be listed on the Nasdaq in 2023. Going into 2023, there was some uncertainty given the market condition at the time and the geopolitical environment between China and US as a backdrop. Everyone in the industry was paying close attention to Lichen to see on the one hand, whether it would be approved by the regulators as a Chinese issuer and on the other hand, whether it would successfully close its offering in a rather soft market.
Fortunately, and giving credit to the underwriter, Univest Securities, the company was able to get past the finish line and successfully list on the Nasdaq on 6 February 2023, during the Chinese New Year celebration period. The deal gave confidence to the market because everyone saw that the US stock market is still welcoming of China-based issuers and companies can still raise significant amount of money to help expand their business even though the equity market has been slow as of late.
Lichen engaged our firm to represent them as their US counsel for their IPO onto the Nasdaq Stock Market and I was their lead attorney for their IPO process. We worked closely with the company on almost all aspects of their US IPO, including their prospectus, application to Nasdaq and responses to questions given by the regulators, as well as transaction documents with the underwriter and its counsel.
We were also crucial in helping design a deal structure that would work both for the company and, more importantly, the regulators. This was the case especially towards the end of the process, because the market condition had changed significantly comparing to when Lichen first launched its IPO effort. We, as the company’s counsel, had to pull every trick in our sleeves to come up with legal solutions to make sure that they were able to get through the regulators with as little modification in the documents as possible, but at the same time assuring them that the company was worthy of their consideration for approval.
Lichen’s IPO was significant in a sense that it was the first small-cap IPO by a China-based issuer to be listed on the Nasdaq in 2023.
We also understood that in today’s market, things could change in a matter of hours and the longer the process drags, the bigger the risk is to our client in finishing their IPO. Knowing timing was of the essence, our team worked tirelessly with all parties involved, including our client Lichen, regulators and the underwriter on a practically 24/7 basis, with multiple versions being prepared at the same time to make sure that we had the necessary legal documents ready for everyone when they were needed.
We were very glad and relieved when we saw Lichen finally close its IPO and begin trading on the Nasdaq. At the same time, I am extremely proud and grateful for our team members that were involved in this listing. It would not have been possible without their dedication and commitment.
First, we consider ourselves business lawyers. What that means is that we always dissect the laws and regulations coming from the perspective of a business owner. I come from a business background before becoming a lawyer so I understand that ultimately the lawyers are here to serve the needs of the business owner, while making sure that the business decisions are legally compliant. We try not to create more legal issues for our clients, but rather provide them with a practical solution to solve their day-to-day problems.
Second, we consider ourselves experts in dealing with companies based in Asia. Most of our staff, including myself, are multi-lingual and actually spent a significant amount of our lives in Asia. At the same time, we are well-versed in bridging the differences the Eastern and Western values. This is particularly important when we work with the regulators. Most of my clients are based in Asia and some of them may have never been to the US. Because of that, we are often not only serving as their lawyers, but also serving as their only voice when their profile is being presented in front of the regulators and investor community. Our strength is to bridge any gap or difference in views the best we can because we truly understand where both sides come from.
Lastly, we take pride in our ability in anticipating any potential issue before they become an issue. Like everything else, success is all about the preparation you put in. While we are good at tackling the issues in front of us, we try to plan many steps in advance before making one move. Because of our experience in dealing with many issuers from the past, we have built in certain standard protocol to streamline the process. In addition, we are constantly thinking the unpredictable to make sure that there is no surprise in the process. As doctors always say, the best medical care is preventive care. We have the same mindset.
We consider ourselves business lawyers. What that means is that we always dissect the laws and regulations coming from the perspective of a business owner.
The entire IPO process can be a rather lengthy journey, one filled with uncertainties. As an issuer’s counsel, we try to prepare for as many potential issues as possible, but it is almost impossible to cover all of them. In today’s world, market conditions could change overnight. As a result, regulatory response in reaction to that could suddenly change as well. In our eyes, this is the inherent risk that we will need to deal with when taking a company public because these changes could potentially prolong the process or sometimes even jeopardise the outcome. I always advise my clients that if we have a chance to close a deal, just do it as soon as practicable. The longer one waits, the bigger the risk of failure there is.
Besides the market risk, we also need to be mindful of the local regulations as we deal with many overseas clients. Even though we are US lawyers, I always try to first educate myself on the applicable regulations in the jurisdiction that our client is located in. I then either pass on the information to our staff or ask them to further research the local laws in details. Sometimes the biggest concern is what you do not know and you do not want to step onto that regulatory landmine. Because we are often dealing with two or more sets of laws at the same time, we have to learn to navigate and find an equilibrium where the client is compliant both in the US and locally.
As I always say, nothing is ever easy. Nothing can be taken for granted these days, especially in today’s world, where everything must be accomplished in a collaborative manner. Everyone is a small piece of a bigger puzzle and yet everyone is interconnected. However, things often do not go the way you envision them to when you first start, for whatever reason. In our world, there is no such thing as an ‘easy deal’; every one of them has its own hairs. You just need to find a way to pull it out.
When Lichen began its IPO journey in 2021, the market was at its peak with tons of cash up for grabs. The market took a 180-degree turn in 2022 and because of that, the regulators also became more cautious about approving companies to list. The combination of market and policy changes were definitely some of the biggest challenges we faced along the way, as it forced us to constantly go back to the drawing board and come up with solutions that would work in that particular moment. Regardless of the changes, the company’s management showed their perseverance by having only the end goal, which is the final listing, in their eyesight. We, as their legal counsel, are very appreciative of their determination because we have seen others bail in similar situations.
When Lichen began its IPO journey in 2021, the market was at its peak with tons of cash up for grabs.
The bread-and-butter product of my practice area is to help Asia-based companies getting listed on a US stock exchange. Lichen China’s main operation is based in Fujian Province, China. Their management team has very little experience about the US capital market, and in fact speaks very little English, yet they have their own version of the American dream. We were called upon to represent them during their IPO process. Our team drafted their prospectus, prepared their Nasdaq application and assisted the company with their response to the comments provided by the regulators.
The representation of Lichen China is the epitome of what our firm is about. We are a New York law firm that serves clients with international vision and ambition.
As the issuer’s counsel on an IPO, we would be considered the ‘quarterback’ of the entire listing process. We would need to coordinate and control the documents with all parties, including the company, underwriter and its counsel, auditor and others. We were fortunate that the underwriter, its counsel, and the auditors were all teams that we had previously worked with and therefore the familiarity made the process easier. We were also fortunate to have the trust that the company placed in us in dealing with the professional parties rather than micromanaging everything themselves.
Knowing the working style of each professional party in advance was helpful in terms of our preparation throughout the process. Just by knowing the expectation of what the other side wanted, we cut down the communication time needed to achieve the results that we and our client wanted. We would prepare documents knowing the nuances involving the other parties to ensure that the back-and-forth on the documents did not become an endless process. In my nine years of law practice, there has never been a true ‘friendly’ transaction. There would always be some sticking point that became an issue for some party. Lichen’s IPO was no different, but we respected the requests of other parties while representing our client’s interests zealously. We were pleased that the collaboration with other others led to a satisfactory outcome for everyone.
The IPO raise gave the company a fresh injection of cash to help them execute on their business plan. In China, it is very difficult to obtain financing from traditional means with the banks unless there are significant assets being collateralised and personal guarantees from those with vested interest. Lichen’s success story in accessing the US equity market, being a Chinese company, gave many similar companies the confidence that they could do the same.
As the issuer’s counsel on an IPO, we would be considered the ‘quarterback’ of the entire listing process.
In addition to the capital raise, the prestige of being a Nasdaq-listed company has helped Lichen increase its brand value in its own industry. Many business partners would feel much more comfortable in doing business with a publicly listed company than with an unknown private company.
Lastly, as a publicly traded company, companies like Lichen can now use their stock in lieu of cash to acquire other businesses to support or expand their existing business lines. Lichen’s Nasdaq listing really led the way for many Chinese issuers with respect to their own IPO effort in 2023. To date, it is estimated that almost two dozen China-based issuers have listed on a US exchange in 2023.
Taking a company public is never a one-man effort. First and foremost, all of our staff are amazing lawyers, incredibly hardworking and knowledgeable about what they do. I have also received unlimited support from my partners within our firm to complete each transaction. When we take on an IPO client, we always carry with the mindset of ‘we go in as a team and we come out as a team’. We have really built a very collegial environment, which I am personally very proud of myself.
The short answer is yes and no. Our New York office will continue to service our global clients the way it always has been. However, we are also particularly excited for the opportunities being presented to us in 2023. In October 2022, we opened our Singapore office and sister firm under the brand of “Ortoli Rosenstadt Ye Ptd. Ltd.”.
We are a fully registered foreign law practice approved by the Ministry of Law in Singapore. This is our first flagship office outside of New York. Much of the firm’s resources have been put into the initial setup of the Singapore affiliate firm and we have started investing in top local talents and marketing efforts to build a local presence in the ASEAN region. While we are a New York law firm by blood, we want to take a more localised approach in meeting the needs of the clients in the region. Things have been put in motion with the goal to showcase the US capital market world to the companies in the region and educate those who are interested how the US capital market can benefit and accelerate the growth of this particular region.
Going into 2023, China still remains to be our largest market and we do not expect that to change in the near term. However, the launch of our Singapore office really expands our coverage within Asia into Southeast Asia, allowing our firm to cover companies in countries such as Singapore, Malaysia, Indonesia, Thailand and Vietnam. It could also reach as far as Australia given the closeness of the time difference, thus allowing our firm to service our overseas clients around the clock.
[ymal]
I think that this is a region that has been a bit overlooked in the past and I see with my own eyes that a lot of exciting things are happening there. Given that, our goal is to bring cutting-edge legal expertise from the US to their footsteps. Also, this is not just limited to the capital market practice. It would apply to other practices as well, such as real estate, corporate M&A and even litigation or arbitration matters. This was a strategic move for us with a long-term vision.
Jason Ye, Partner
366 Madison Ave, 3rd Flr, New York, NY 10017, USA
Tel: +1 212-588-0022
Jason Ye is a Partner at Ortoli Rosenstadt LLP and Co-Chair of the firm’s Asia practice. Jason’s practice is focused on cross-border corporate and capital market transactions and he has represented many domestic and international companies, investment banks and institutional investors on a broad range of transactions. Recognised as one of the most prolific attorneys in the field, Jason also regularly represents public companies, particularly those based in Asia, regarding their NYSE or Nasdaq initial listing and post-listing compliance.
Ortoli Rosenstadt LLP is a full-service New York law firm that represents US and international clients. Its multilingual team provides services in the areas of corporate law, securities, international transactions, litigation, employment law, franchising and international tax both domestically and across multiple jurisdictions.
The United States, with one of the highest lawyers per capita in the world, is known for a culture of litigiousness. In this article, we use the US as a backdrop to discuss the ways in which reckless litigation can backfire, and ask whether the balance of risk can ever truly be said to favour the defendant over the plaintiff.
There are a number of ways in which an organisation that aggressively pursues litigation can ultimately damage its own interests.
The first and most obvious form this fallout may take is harm to the plaintiff’s reputation. This is a risk for any organisation whose business model relies on a friendly image, as legal action that they take (particularly against smaller entities) may be represented by media as excessively heavy-handed. One recent high-profile case has come from video game giant Nintendo, whose suit against console ‘hacker’ Gary Bowser led to a 40-month prison sentence and $14.5 million in damages being awarded to the company. This has led to widespread condemnation among the press and Nintendo’s customer base as it emerged that Bowser would be paying damages in installments worth 25-30% of his monthly salary, likely for the rest of his life.
For a prime example of similar reputational damage occurring to an individual, we need only look at 1994’s Liebeck vs McDonald’s Restaurants, which became widely known as the McDonald’s coffee-spilling case. When plaintiff Stella Liebeck was badly burned by a cup of McDonald’s coffee that spilled in her lap, eventually culminating in her being awarded $160,000 in compensatory damages and $2.7 million in punitive damages, the case became a byword for willful victimhood and a poster child of the American culture of litigiousness.
In reality, the details of the case do not support this perception of events, but the opposite. The 81-year-old Liebeck’s third-degree burn wounds were far more severe than might have been expected from a typical coffee spill, and the apparently excessive punitive damages awarded were only greater than the $20,000 Liebeck had initially sought to cover her medical expenses because McDonald’s had refused to settle (and were ultimately reduced to $480,000 by the trial judge in any case). Yet the popular perception of the lawsuit as an example of get-rich-quick opportunism on the victim’s part has never disappeared, and McDonald’s own reputation has certainly not fared the worse for it.
Beyond the reputational damage they stand to receive, plaintiffs whose actions appear overly litigious may also incur concrete financial penalties. Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedures enables a fair amount of leeway for likely frivolous cases to be aired in court. However, should a court deem a suit groundless or “presented for any improper purpose”, heavy sanctions may be levied against the party at fault.
Beyond the reputational damage they stand to receive, plaintiffs whose actions appear overly litigious may also incur concrete financial penalties.
There are several prominent examples of such a strategy proving costly. In March 2022, for example, former president Donald Trump sued Hillary Clinton for $24 million in damages, claiming that she had unfairly framed him as a willing recipient of Russian assistance during the 2016 presidential race. As observers noted at the time, the suit was filed five years after Trump won the election upon which it was based, and three years after special counsel Robert Mueller concluded that Trump had been “receptive” to Russian aid during that time.
As a consequence, in January 2023 a federal judge found the lawsuit to be frivolous, remarking in the judgment that its “inadequacy as a legal claim was evident from the start” and that a reasonable lawyer would not have filed it. Trump and his legal counsel were ordered to pay $66,000 in court penalties and legal fees as well as $937,989.39 in sanctions, an amount noted by the judge to be substantial. Legal experts have also suggested that Trump’s more recent $500 million lawsuit against longtime lawyer Michael Cohen is likely to end in a similar fashion.
Both reputational and monetary damages can clearly be a deterrent to reckless litigation. But on balance, is the risk the same for both parties involved?
At the end of the day, as much as an ill-received lawsuit can harm a company, the cost of being the target of legal action is generally far higher than it is to pursue it. This is borne out in every metric for how litigants may be adversely affected by a lawsuit, whether material or immaterial.
In general, larger organisations – the kind that are most likely to resort to litigation in the first place – are generally much better-placed to do so, having the resources and connections necessary to retain effective attorneys. For smaller organisations, whose best hope for success in a lawsuit is to avoid becoming involved in it, the fees accrued from defending themselves against legal action pose much more of a financial threat. This is obviously exacerbated if the lawsuit is unforeseen, while the plaintiff has the benefit of advance preparation.
Even reputational harm is often less of an issue for the litigating party, as many examples demonstrate. When Ford Motor Company infamously responded to concerns about the safety of its Pinto model by defending itself against incoming lawsuits rather than improving the design, it suffered reputational damage that is still used as a study in corporate recklessness to this day. There are far fewer historical cases in which the ‘aggressors’ in litigation fared as poorly.
[ymal]
For the largest companies, legal disputes need not even be a barrier to future cooperation; Nokia’s 2016 patent infringement claim against Apple, for which the Finnish telecom company received $2 billion when Apple agreed to settle, did not prevent the two giants from agreeing to collaborate on further R&D projects that same year.
This paints a rather intimidating picture for companies that do not have the resources to match corporate giants when it comes to pursuing or settling legal cases. With the balance of risk evidently leaning towards plaintiffs in most cases, even smaller organisations and individuals are better served looking to their defences far in advance of any such trouble arising. Hence, the need for SMEs to avoid neglecting their legal counsel remains as strong as ever.
If so, you’ll soon find out that there are several bureaucratic hurdles to navigate to make sure your transition is smooth and successful. But don't let the paperwork overwhelm or discourage you! With careful organization and a little know-how about what workflows need to be tackled, it's possible to tackle the “business side” of moving with ease. In this blog post, we'll cover some practical tips for managing all the administrative details associated with going overseas — from gathering foreign money exchange rates, applying for pertinent visas, and locating housing options. We will also provide resources so that any confusion along the way can be broken down into easy-to-follow instructions - because nothing should stand in between you and your eagerly anticipated move abroad!
Moving to a new country can be a daunting experience, and one of the most important things to do before settling in is to research the rules and regulations of your new home. From visa requirements to taxation laws, there are plenty of factors to consider. However, don't let the initial overwhelm deter you from doing your due diligence. Learning about the customs and expectations of your new country can be enlightening and can help you feel much more at ease in your new surroundings.
So take the time to conduct thorough research and familiarize yourself with both the laws and the culture of your new home. With a little bit of preparation, you can embark on your new adventure with greater peace of mind. One of the most popular visas for those moving abroad are investment-based ones such as the golden visa in Portugal, for example. Investing in property can be a great way to get residency rights and legal status, as it shows your commitment to the country you are relocating to.
In most countries, foreigners who buy property gain special benefits such as tax breaks or income exemptions. However, there are often additional costs associated with owning property overseas so make sure that you factor these into your budget when you plan for the move. It is also wise to consult a specialist in real estate laws before making any investment decisions.
If you're planning on living or working in a country other than your own, obtaining a visa may be essential. A visa is a legal document that allows you to enter, remain, or depart a country for a specific period or purpose. While some countries have visa-free agreements with others, it's crucial to research if your desired destination requires a visa for your intended stay. Obtaining the proper visa can be a long and complicated process, but it's worth it to ensure you have the right to live and work in your chosen country. So, take the time to do the necessary research and paperwork to acquire a visa that allows for long-term residency or work rights. Additionally, you can try something different.
One of the most exciting and nerve-wracking things about moving to a new country is adapting to its rules and regulations. One of the most important rules to follow is obtaining a driver's license if it applies to you. It may seem overwhelming, but with a bit of research and preparation, you can confidently hit the road in your new home. Not only will it allow for greater independence and mobility, but it will also provide a sense of accomplishment as you navigate through the process. So, take a deep breath, buckle up, and get ready for a new driving adventure in your new country.
Embarking on the journey to apply for residency can be a daunting task, but with proper organization and preparation, it can be a smooth and stress-free process. One of the essential steps is gathering all the necessary documents, such as your birth certificate, passport, and any other identification documents required by your host country. It is crucial to ensure that all these documents are up to date and meet the requirements set by the immigration authorities. By gathering all the required papers beforehand, you can avoid delays, additional costs, and unnecessary stress along the way. So, take the time to gather all your necessary documents and be on your way to starting your new life in a new country!
Moving to a new location can be both exciting and daunting. One of the most important things to consider when relocating is your healthcare coverage. Whether you are moving for work, school, or just for a change of scenery, it is crucial to ensure that your health needs are met in your new home. Applying for healthcare coverage may seem overwhelming, but it is essential to have access to quality medical care. Don't let the stress of a move keep you from taking care of yourself. Apply for the healthcare coverage you need and rest easy knowing that you are well taken care of.
As exciting as it is to relocate to a new country, it is also important to become familiar with its tax laws. Every country has its tax code, and it can be overwhelming for citizens who are relocating abroad. It's crucial to research the tax laws of the new country to avoid any legal issues and make sure you are compliant. This research should be done before you even arrive in the new country. Understanding the tax laws and how they relate to you as a foreign citizen will help you plan and budget accordingly. With the right knowledge, relocating abroad can be a smooth and successful experience.
Moving abroad can be an overwhelming experience, and not knowing what you need to do to manage the bureaucratic side of it may add stress. By following this guide, you can help ease a bit of that burden. Researching the rules and regulations of your new home country will be key in understanding the logistics of your move. Visas, driver's licenses, documents, and healthcare coverage must all be obtained before arriving for long-term stays or work. Lastly, staying aware of tax laws in your new location is important and can pose difficult questions; seek professional guidance if needed. Ultimately, completing all the steps mentioned before moving should help make your transition smoother in your new country of residence.
The mishap was not your fault so you need not pay anything nor do you need to suffer. However, getting compensation is not an easy task. It takes time and struggle. Yes! You read it right. I’m talking about struggle or efforts to prove your claims. And you can only prove your claims with the help of evidence.
You have indeed faced hardships but you can’t win your injury lawsuit until you prove what you are claiming. No one can help you if you don't provide any evidence. Your insurance companies won’t pay you without any proof that the third party is responsible for your injury and the jury won’t give you any favour without evidence.
Therefore, you should take legal help from the Lake Charles Personal Injury Attorney. Your lawyer will help you in collecting the evidence and he will work on your case to make it strong and claim the compensation that you deserve.
Indeed, there are different types of personal injury cases and every case is different from another case. It is not necessary that one type of evidence also works for the other personal injury case. But some common types of evidence are essential for every personal injury lawsuit to make it win. These types of evidence include
The photographs or videos are solid evidence that can’t be denied easily and these types of evidence are enough to make it clear who was at fault. You can collect the videos from CCTV cameras or surveillance cameras, these cameras record everything and show what happened.
However, you can capture pictures after the accident or can ask someone to take pictures of injuries you have gone through due to the negligence of another person or company. Making videos or capturing photographs of the incident has become common practice in this digital era and is useful evidence to prove the fault.
You must have called the police after an accident. Police officers after responding to the call, investigate everything, collect the statements from both parties and make a detailed report that contains valuable information related to the incident. Your personal injury lawyer can request copies of the police report as this report works as evidence.
Testimonies of eye-witnesses play a great role and the jury gives preference to these testimonies as they are outsiders and were present during the incident so they must have observed each and everything. You should record their testimonies and ask them for their contact number because sometimes they leave before the police arrive.
Severe accidents make you suffer badly and you confront injuries. Due to injuries, you have to go for medical checkups, treatments, tests, medication, therapies, surgeries, and so on. These medical procedures are expensive and lengthy as they take time to recover completely.
Keep these receipts, bills, test reports, and prescriptions. This medical record will show how severe your injury was.
Due to severe incidents, it becomes hard for you to go to work. You take long leaves from work and this affects your wages. Sometimes the victim becomes permanently disabled after the incidents and they lose their job and will suffer financially for life long.
You should provide an authentic report of income that shows how much money you would have earned till the time of retirement if you haven't been in an accident.
Some experts investigate the case and do research on the case to make sure what happened, how it happened, and who was responsible for the incident. Experts study severe cases in detail. Therefore, the testimonies of experts play an important role in the court before the jury.
Suffering and pains are subjective and these are difficult to measure but suffering and pain can be described. You can describe the activities that have been affected after suffering or express your pain in emotional words that depict the picture of your sorrows.
Evidence is important to win any kind of legal case. And these are the common types of evidence that are essential to prove every kind of personal injury lawsuit. But obviously, the only evidence won’t work if you don’t have an experienced or professional lawyer at your side. Therefore, you should hire a Lake Charles Personal Injury Attorney if you want to win the case and get fair compensation for all the losses you have faced.
Unfortunately, accidents happen to people in their workplaces. Sometimes it is just a little scrape, other times it can be a broken leg or arm. The worst outcome is someone dying at work due to an accident. Make sure that your workplace is up to WHS (Work Health Safety) standards and safe for everyone present.
A workplace accident is when someone gets hurt at their place of employment. There are multiple injuries that a person can sustain, including cuts, bruises, broken bones, sprains and tears of ligaments, tendons, and muscles, herniated discs, whiplash, wear and tear, and neck and back injuries. These workplace injuries can have various causes, such as car accidents, slipping and falling, falls from high places, wear and tear, electrocution, overexertion, being hit by something, being hit against something, getting entangled, and violence like bullying.
The worst-case scenario is death. The three most deadly injuries in the workplace are vehicle-related incidents, something falling on a person, and being hit by something. Most work-related deaths occur in the agriculture, forestry, fishing, mining, manufacturing, transport, postal, warehousing, construction, electricity, gas, water, and waste services industries. People who work as machinery operators and drivers, labourers, technicians, and trade workers are more likely to be killed at work.
Those who have lost loved ones in workplace-related accidents can get help from insurance companies and legal advisors, like Murphy’s Law, about what to do next. Compensation can be claimed from the deceased person’s employer. There are two kinds of claims for this, namely Dependency Claims and Psychological Injury or ‘Nervous Shock Claims’. Compensation claims can be made using WorkCover, the government workers’ compensation scheme, or through the court. When a claim is made through WorkCover it has to be made within six months after someone’s death. When claiming through the court, it has to be done within three years of the person’s death.
Dependency Claims can be made by the deceased person’s husband, wife, partner, children younger than 18, and children over 18 who can prove that they are financially dependent on the deceased. These are people who are financially impacted by the death of the person.
Psychological Injury and Nervous Shock Claims can be made by people who were psychologically affected by the event of a worker’s death. They experience mental health injuries witnessing the event, such as depression, anxiety, and PTSD. These individuals include co-workers who saw the person die, co-workers who tried to help following the accident, first responders who reported to the scene, and family members of the deceased person. This claim can only be made when it can be proven that the working conditions were hazardous.
The amount of compensation depends on who is claiming it, and how it is claimed. The money can either be paid immediately in one amount or once a quarter. The amount will cover funeral costs, medical costs, and the amount that is needed to cover other expenses and services that the deceased used to cover. This depends on the number of dependents, how old they are, and how financially dependent they are. The exact amount of money that can be claimed is set out in the appropriate legislation. When the number of dependents is high, the amount is higher. When the dependents are fewer, the amount of money is less.
When someone claims compensation for the death that someone suffered at their place of work, they have to provide specific documentation. Firstly, they will have to prove that the deceased died at work, or due to injuries or illnesses sustained at work. Secondly, they will need to provide a medical certificate, death certificate, coroner’s inquest report, or autopsy findings. Thirdly, proof will be needed that they are indeed family of the deceased, or that they were financially dependent on that person. This included birth certificates, marriage certificates, and other documents that prove any de facto connections. Finally, the claimant will need to provide proof that the deceased gave them financial support, like bank statements.
Businesses are required by law to meet the regulations for Work Health and Safety (WHS) and Occupational Health and Safety (OHS). It is worth noting that there is no real difference between WHS and OHS. These regulations determine if a workplace is safe for everyone involved, which includes employees, volunteers, contractors, suppliers, visitors, and customers.
WHS legislation has a risk management process that involves four steps.
This can be done by conducting inspections of a workplace. Incidents have to be reported and potential injuries have to be logged in a risk register. During the inspection, interviews have to be conducted with workers about how safe they feel their workplace is.
This is where the effects and seriousness of a hazard on people in the workplace are determined. Risk analysis looks at the kind of hazard, its consequence, likelihood, frequency, duration, impact, and other aspects of the working environment and people.
During this step it is determined what the necessary steps are that will get rid of or control a risk to the health and safety of workers. If a hazard can’t be removed, the Hierarchy of Risk Control can be used to find the best way to minimise risk. This hierarchy involves:
● Design and reorganisation to get rid of a hazard in the workplace.
● Get rid of, or replace the hazard.
● Cut the hazard off and isolate it.
● Use engineering controls to minimise the hazard.
● Administrative controls can be used to minimise the hazard.
● Proper personal protective equipment should be made available.
Every second year the control measures and risk assessments should be conducted again to make sure that the right regulations are in place for the safety of everyone. It is also done to make sure that the guidelines are actually being followed, and not just being ignored.
Conclusion
This article looks at fatal work accidents and the help that can be provided to prevent these accidents, as well as support after they have happened. It lists injuries that can be sustained at work, as well as how they are caused. The deadliest incidents and industries are mentioned. The two kinds of fatal workplace accident compensation are identified, along with who can claim compensation depending on the kind. An overview is given on how much the compensation claims are and what they cover. The WHS and OHS are discussed, as well as the WHS risk management process to maximise the safety of everyone present at places of work.
Due to their massive size and weight, commercial trucks can cause catastrophic damage to people and property. Injuries resulting from truck accidents are often severe, leaving victims with lifelong disabilities, medical bills, and emotional trauma. This article explores why truck accidents are particularly injurious and deadly, discusses truck accident personal injury law in Louisiana, and provides guidance on selecting a good truck accident personal injury lawyer in Louisiana.
The severity of injuries resulting from truck accidents is due to several factors. First, commercial trucks are much larger and heavier than passenger vehicles. The average passenger vehicle weighs around 4,000 pounds, while a loaded tractor-trailer can weigh up to 80,000 pounds. The force of a collision involving a truck and a smaller vehicle can be catastrophic. The occupants of the smaller vehicle are much more likely to sustain severe injuries or be killed.
Second, trucks have longer stopping distances than passenger vehicles. A truck traveling at 60 miles per hour can take up to 525 feet to come to a complete stop, while a passenger vehicle traveling at the same speed can stop at about 300 feet. If a truck driver is not paying attention or is driving too fast for the conditions, they may not be able to stop in time to avoid a collision.
Third, trucks are more prone to rollover accidents. Due to their height and weight, trucks have a higher center of gravity than passenger vehicles. This makes them more susceptible to tipping over in a sharp turn or when driving at high speeds. Rollover accidents can result in catastrophic injuries or fatalities, particularly if the truck collides with other vehicles.
Finally, truck drivers often face intense pressure to meet delivery deadlines, leading to driver fatigue, distraction, and speeding. In some cases, trucking companies may also prioritize profits over safety, leading to inadequate training or maintenance. When truck drivers and companies prioritize profits over safety, they put everyone on the road at risk.
If you or a loved one has been injured in a truck accident in Louisiana, you may be entitled to compensation. Louisiana is a fault-based state, meaning that the party at fault for the accident is responsible for paying damages to the injured party. These types of personal injury lawsuits can be highly complex, as they involve multiple parties, including the truck driver, the trucking company, and the truck manufacturer.
Louisiana law allows for two types of damages in personal injury cases: economic and non-economic. Economic damages include quantifiable expenses, such as medical bills, lost wages, and property damage. Non-economic damages include more subjective losses, such as pain and suffering, emotional distress, and loss of enjoyment of life. In cases where the truck driver's conduct was particularly egregious, punitive damages may also be awarded.
In Louisiana, the statute of limitations for personal injury claims is one year from the date of the accident. This means that you must file your claim within one year of the accident, or you may lose your right to seek compensation.
Selecting the right lawyer is crucial to the success of your case. First, look for a lawyer with experience handling truck accident cases. Truck accident cases can be complex, and it is important to have a lawyer with the knowledge and experience necessary to navigate the legal system. You should look for reviews and testimonials from past clients who had similar lawsuits to get a sense of the lawyer's track record and level of client satisfaction.
Make sure your Louisiana truck accident lawyer is licensed to practice law in Louisiana and is in good standing with the state bar association. You can check a lawyer's credentials and disciplinary history on the Louisiana State Bar Association's website.
Schedule a consultation. Most personal injury lawyers offer free consultations. Take advantage of this opportunity to meet with the lawyer and discuss your case. Ask questions about the lawyer's experience, approach to handling cases, and fees. During this meeting, you should assess the lawyer’s communication skills, including if they are responsive to your questions and treat you with respect.
Finally, understand how your lawyer will be paid and discuss this ahead of time. Most personal injury lawyers work on a contingency fee basis, which means that they only get paid if you receive a settlement or judgment in your favor. Make sure you understand the lawyer's fee structure and what percentage of your settlement or judgment the lawyer will take as their fee.
Truck accidents can be incredibly deadly, and they could turn your whole world upside down; this is why you must have a great personal injury lawyer on your side as you seek to receive justice for your accident. By following these tips, you can find a lawyer who will fight for justice and ensure that you receive the compensation you deserve.
If you are looking for a lucrative and exciting career, but you are on the fence about what you should do, it is well worth considering a career in the legal industry. This is an industry where services are always going to be in demand, and there are many different types of jobs you can go for depending on your skills, qualifications, experience, and interests. There is also plenty of room for advancement in this field, and you can look forward to earning a good income.
There are lots of reasons why people decide to enter a career within this sector, and if you want a satisfying and rewarding career, it could be the perfect career field for you. Of course, you need to look at the job options and decide what type of legal work you want to get involved with. There is everything from lawyer and paralegal jobs to legal secretary and law clerk positions you can consider. In this article, we will look at some of the top reasons to work in the legal industry.
There are many reasons you might want to consider a legal career, and it is well worth pursuing this dream if it is something that interests you. Some of the reasons to consider a job in this sector are:
One of the key reasons to consider a career in this sector is that you can look forward to a good income. Jobs within the legal sector are generally well paid, particularly in jobs such as paralegal and lawyer positions. So, if you want to earn a good income doing something that you enjoy, a career within this industry is well worth considering.
Another key benefit of going into the legal sector is that there are lots of different job options. This means that you can find a job that fits in with your interests, skills, and qualifications. Of course, you can also study online and gain more qualifications if you have a specific type of legal career in mind for which you are not yet qualified. You should also create a solid resume using the various legal resume templates online. The wide range of positions also means that you can enjoy good opportunities for advancement within this sector.
It is worth remembering that legal services are always going to be in demand, and this means that you also get to benefit from job security. Most people are keen to get into a job that offers a lot of security, and with an industry such as this, you can achieve this goal with greater ease. This means greater peace of mind for you when it comes to your job too, which is a bonus.
These are some of the key reasons why it is well worth considering a career within the legal industry. You can enjoy a secure job that is interesting, rewarding, and offers lots of progression opportunities.
Then, virtual data rooms provide the perfect solution.
As the digital revolution continues to drive efficiency in business, virtual data rooms are becoming increasingly popular and essential tools for streamlining processes like due diligence, document exchange, and negotiations.
A virtual data room simplifies collaboration across various tasks, including capturing documents, analyzing financial data, managing large volumes of information, and much more!
With features such as security protocols designed specifically with mergers and acquisition deals in mind — VDRs deliver peace of mind when sharing confidential files with external parties, even in the worst mergers and acquisitions. Read on to find out why VDR is the ideal solution for your M&A deal flow.
Virtual data rooms (VDRs) have become increasingly popular in mergers and acquisitions (M&A) due to their ability to store and share sensitive documents securely.
In M&A transactions, all parties involved in the deal must have access to the same information to make informed decisions.
VDRs provide a secure platform where various stakeholders can collaborate on important documents and meet regulatory compliance requirements.
One of the most important aspects of data room vendors is security. VDRs offer advanced security measures such as encryption and two-factor authentication to ensure confidential documents remain secure from any unauthorized access or manipulation.
Furthermore, document tracking tools allow users to monitor who has accessed what files. All this makes virtual data room providers one of the most secure online storage solutions for sensitive data.
The collaborative features offered by VDRs make them ideal for M&A deals, as multiple stakeholders can easily review documents simultaneously without having to meet up or exchange emails with each other physically.
Documents can be uploaded into a single repository which ensures all parties have access to the latest versions of the materials they need.
Additionally, collaboration tools such as annotation support, chat rooms, and discussion forums allow users to communicate with each other seamlessly while still maintaining confidentiality.
Finally, using data room software is cost-effective compared to traditional document-sharing methods, such as sending physical copies by mail or exchanging files via email.
Not only does it save time, but it also eliminates unnecessary overhead costs associated with printing and shipping documents around the world for review.
As was already mentioned, virtual data rooms (VDRs) provide an effective solution for securely sharing digital documents and collaborative tools that facilitate the completion of mergers and acquisitions (M&A) transactions.
Here is a breakdown of the role VDRs play in a typical M&A process overview:
1. Preparation. Preparation involves setting up the deal structure, defining roles and responsibilities, and drafting confidentiality agreements. During this stage, VDRs are used to store sensitive documents such as legal agreements to ensure they remain secure from any unauthorized access or manipulation.
2. Marketing. In this stage, sellers market their business to potential buyers by sending out confidential information packages known as teaser packages. These packages are usually stored in a VDR for easy sharing with potential buyers while guaranteeing that only approved investors can access them.
3. Due diligence. During due diligence, a prospective buyer conducts thorough research about the target company to evaluate its financial health, operational capacity, and other aspects of the deal process. To facilitate this process, all necessary documents, such as financial statements and tax returns, can be uploaded into a secure online data room software allowing various stakeholders to easily review them without having to meet physically.
4. Negotiation. Once all parties involved have agreed on the terms and conditions of the deal, negotiations begin, where important decisions such as price negotiation take place. Data room services offer features such as annotation support which allows team members to comment on documents without affecting their original content so any changes can be tracked throughout the negotiation process easily.
5. Closing. The closing stage marks the formal signing of contracts between two parties completing a successful transaction which usually includes signing legal documents such as non-disclosure agreements (NDAs). Documents are often stored in a VDR before signing, which ensures that everyone has access to the latest version and guarantees high levels of security since NDAs contain confidential information that must remain private from any third-party intervention or manipulation.
Now, let’s take a look at some of the key features of VDRs that make them ideal for managing M&A transactions:
Customizable permission settings are essential to ensure the safety and integrity of confidential documents in a VDR.
Users can customize access rights based on roles and user groups, allowing only certain deal team members to access certain documents or folders within the repository.
Reporting and analytics are useful for gaining insights into usage patterns, including who has accessed what documents, how long they were viewed for, etc., thereby helping users make better decisions about the deal process.
These tools can also be used for tracking compliance with data privacy regulations such as GDPR or HIPAA.
Q&A management tools are used to manage questions and answers related to documents stored in an electronic data room. This allows users to exchange questions and answers securely without having to meet physically or exchange emails.
The Q&A feature also provides an audit trail that helps track conversations between users involved in the deal.
Bulk file uploads and downloads are essential features that enable users to quickly transfer large amounts of data into or out of a virtual data room with minimal effort.
Automatic indexing helps users easily organize large volumes of documents by categorizing them according to metadata such as author name, date created, keywords, etc.
At the same time, OCR technology enables full-text search capabilities, allowing users to instantly locate desired files within a repository using keywords or phrases. This drastically reduces the time spent searching for relevant information needed during negotiations.
The M&A process is quite complicated and requires a lot of effort to manage efficiently.
VDRs are becoming increasingly popular for M&A transactions due to their various features, such as customizable permission settings, reporting and analytics tools, Q&A management features, bulk file uploads/downloads, automatic indexing, and OCR technology.
So, by leveraging the power of VDRs, businesses can streamline the M&A process to ensure that deals are handled properly, quickly, and securely!
Economic data releases, such as GDP growth, unemployment rates, and inflation, are closely watched by policymakers, investors, and analysts alike, and can have significant legal and financial implications. In this article, we take a closer look at the legal implications of economic data releases.
One of the key legal implications of economic data releases is the potential for inaccurate or misleading data to lead to legal consequences. For example, if economic data is misrepresented or misreported, it could lead to legal action by investors or regulators who have relied on the data to make investment or regulatory decisions. Similarly, if economic data is used to support legal arguments or decisions, but is later found to be inaccurate, it could undermine the legal basis for those decisions.
The US economic calendar is used by finance and business professionals around the globe to make decisions about investments. Therefore, inaccurate data in the events listed in these can have a significant impact on major sectors in all corners of the world. To reduce the risks of inaccurate or misleading data, there are several legal and regulatory frameworks in place to ensure the accuracy and reliability of economic data. Financial institutions and analysts who rely on economic data must adhere to regulatory guidelines and ethical standards to ensure the accuracy and reliability of their analyses.
Another legal implication of economic data releases is the potential for insider trading or other forms of securities fraud. There is a risk that individuals or organisations with early access to economic data could use that information to gain an unfair advantage in the market.
To prevent insider trading and other forms of securities fraud, there are several legal and regulatory frameworks in place. For example, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) enforces laws prohibiting insider trading and requires companies to disclose material information to the public in a timely and fair manner. Additionally, financial institutions and analysts who have early access to economic data must adhere to strict compliance and ethical standards to prevent the misuse of that information.
The intersection of law and the economic calendar also has important implications for employment law. Economic data, such as unemployment rates and job growth, are closely watched by policymakers and regulators as indicators of labour market health. This data can influence labour markets policies and regulations, such as minimum wage laws and unemployment insurance programs.
However, the use of economic data in employment decisions can also raise legal concerns. For example, if an employer uses economic data to justify discriminatory hiring or firing practices, they could be violating anti-discrimination laws. Similarly, if economic data is used to justify labour market policies that disproportionately affect certain demographic groups, there could be legal challenges to the legality of those policies.
The intersection of law and the economic calendar is a complex and multifaceted area, with important legal implications for investors, regulators, and policymakers alike. As economic data continues to play a central role in legal and regulatory decision-making, it is important for stakeholders to be aware of these legal implications and to take steps to mitigate the associated risks.
