Somali Nationals Arrested in Minneapolis During Federal Immigration Sweep

Federal immigration operations in Minneapolis and New Orleans have prompted community concern, raising questions about enforcement practices and due-process protections.

Minneapolis Arrests Prompt Focus on Somali Residents’ Rights

Federal immigration authorities confirmed on Thursday that several people of Somali origin were detained in Minneapolis this week as part of an ongoing enforcement operation that began Monday.

The development surfaced in the Department of Homeland Security’s first public statement on the activity, which outlined profiles of 12 individuals taken into custody.

Those arrested included people from Somalia, Mexico and El Salvador. The announcement followed two days after remarks by former President Donald Trump in which he disparaged Somali immigrants during a televised meeting.

The disclosure matters for residents in Minneapolis, home to the nation’s largest Somali American community, because it comes amid heightened public attention to federal enforcement practices and local concerns about community safety.

Immigration arrests fall under the authority granted to federal agencies in the Immigration and Nationality Act, but operations often intersect with city-level policies on cooperation with federal agents.

The timing has renewed discussions about due-process rights, access to legal representation, and how local governments communicate with immigrant residents when federal activity increases.

Federal Outlines Detail Scope and Timing of Arrests

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) reported that arrests in Minneapolis began on Dec. 1, marking the start of a targeted operation that unfolded across multiple neighborhoods.

While officials did not release a total number, they confirmed that 12 profiles reflected individuals with prior criminal convictions.

DHS regularly publishes enforcement data, and its 2024 annual report noted that nearly 73% of people arrested in similar operations nationwide had criminal histories, context that helps explain how the agency frames the Minneapolis activity.

Among those profiled, five were identified as Somali nationals and others were from Mexico and El Salvador. DHS stated that convictions included offenses ranging from fraud to driving under the influence.

Public records on prior DHS enforcement initiatives show that the agency often prioritizes individuals with past criminal cases, though critics argue that definitions of “public safety threats” vary across administrations.

Minneapolis officials have previously worked with community groups to disseminate information about residents’ rights during federal operations, reflecting the intersection of immigration enforcement with local public-safety planning.

Officials and Community Leaders Express Concern

Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey reiterated his support for the city’s Somali residents, noting that the arrests followed a period of inflammatory national rhetoric.

Minnesota is home to more than 86,000 Somali Americans, according to U.S. Census Bureau estimates, giving Minneapolis a uniquely concentrated stake in enforcement developments.

Federal officials, including DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin, emphasized that those arrested had criminal convictions.

DHS also rejected claims raised by some advocacy groups that operations were conducted without regard for residents’ legal status or criminal history.

In New Orleans, where federal agents also carried out arrests this week, community reaction led to protests that briefly interrupted a city council meeting.

Public concerns there echoed longstanding debates about how immigration operations affect people with mixed-status families or those unsure of their rights.

How the Operations Affect Local Communities

For Minneapolis residents, the arrests have heightened concerns about access to legal assistance and clarity around federal activity.

Attorneys who work on immigration cases note that rapid-response operations can make it difficult for families to locate detained relatives, as transfers to out-of-state facilities sometimes occur shortly after arrest.

Nationally, DHS data shows that individuals may be transferred between facilities for bed-space reasons, complicating access to counsel.

In both Minneapolis and New Orleans, local governments must balance public communication with federal jurisdiction.

Cities cannot block federal immigration enforcement under existing federal law, but they can provide information on civil rights, such as the right not to open a door without a judicial warrant.

Comparable tensions surfaced during major enforcement actions in 2017 and 2019, when multiple cities issued multilingual guidance on residents’ rights amid increased arrests.

Data and Regulatory Context Behind Immigration Enforcement

Immigration arrests fall under federal authority established by the Immigration and Nationality Act, which permits DHS to apprehend individuals who may be subject to removal.

According to DHS’s 2024 Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO) report, the agency made more than 170,000 administrative arrests that year, with roughly half occurring during targeted field operations similar to those described in Minneapolis.

DHS oversight also involves internal review and external accountability mechanisms, such as the DHS Office of Inspector General, which has previously examined operational compliance and civil rights issues.

Public datasets maintained by the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC) at Syracuse University show persistent regional differences in arrest patterns, reflecting varying priorities across field offices.

Next Steps for Federal and Local Authorities

DHS has indicated that enforcement activity in both Minneapolis and New Orleans will continue as scheduled, although no timeline has been provided.

Any forthcoming updates are expected through routine DHS operational summaries or regional field office statements.

Local officials in Minneapolis and New Orleans plan to continue sharing guidance on due-process rights and monitoring the impacts of the operations on residents.

City councils in both locations may consider additional communication measures, particularly in light of recent public meetings where residents requested more transparency around federal activity.

Why the Enforcement Actions Carry Broader Significance

The arrests in Minneapolis and New Orleans underscore how federal immigration operations affect communities with deep immigrant roots and long-standing ties to local institutions.

Somali American residents in Minneapolis and mixed-status households in New Orleans can face added hurdles in navigating federal processes and safeguarding due-process protections.

These developments also shape broader discussions about access to legal support and the role of local authorities during periods of heightened enforcement.

As DHS releases further information, both residents and officials will be monitoring how the operations evolve and what they mean for community trust and public safety.

👉 How the U.S. Immigration Freeze Could Reshape the System 👈