website lm logo figtree 2048x327
Legal Intelligence. Trusted Insight.
Understand Your Rights. Solve Your Legal Problems
winecapanimated1250x200 optimize
Litigation, Arbitration & Investigations

High Court Backs UK Watchdog in £200m Visa and Mastercard Fee Battle

Reading Time:
2
 minutes
Posted: 19th January 2026
George Daniel
Last updated 19th January 2026
Share this article
In this Article

High Court Backs UK Watchdog in £200m Visa and Mastercard Fee Battle

The High Court of Justice has confirmed that the Payment Systems Regulator (PSR) holds the legal authority to cap cross-border card fees. In a judgment delivered on 15 January 2026, Mr Justice Cavanagh dismissed a coordinated judicial review brought by Visa, Mastercard, and Revolut. The ruling provides the regulator with a "green light" to intervene in fee structures that have surged fivefold since Brexit.

The "Operational" vs. "Economic" Split

The claimants’ primary legal theory relied on a narrow reading of Section 54 of the Financial Services (Banking Reform) Act 2013 (FSBRA). They argued the PSR’s power to issue "general directions" was limited to technical or operational "plumbing" of payment systems. Under this view, price-setting would be an unauthorized economic intrusion.

Mr Justice Cavanagh rejected this distinction as a "false dichotomy." The court held that pricing is inherently operational. The ruling clarifies that the PSR’s statutory objectives—promoting competition and protecting service users—grant it the flexibility to cap fees directly. This avoids the need for a multi-year Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) investigation.

The Section 108 Barrier

Mastercard and Revolut advanced a secondary challenge under Section 108 of the FSBRA. They contended the PSR was barred from acting because the fees were already subject to separate payment regulations. The court found this argument "overly broad."

The judgment established that regulatory purpose is the deciding factor. Because the PSR’s "motivating objective" was to address competition failure rather than "access to the system," Section 108 was not engaged. This high-bar ruling prevents firms from using existing regulations as a shield against new, targeted interventions.

From Courtroom to Checkout: What Happens Next?

The PSR estimates that the jump in "outbound" fees—where EU consumers buy from UK shops—costs British businesses between £150 million and £200 million annually. With the legal "vires" challenge resolved, the regulator is shifting focus to the financial mechanics of the cap.

  • The Methodology: The PSR is currently finalizing the Merchant Indifference Test (MIT). This formula identifies the price point where a merchant would be indifferent between accepting a card or a bank transfer.

  • The Stage 2 Cap: Having scrapped an earlier interim plan, the regulator will now move directly to a long-term cap. This will likely bring the current 1.15%–1.5% rates back toward pre-Brexit levels of 0.2%–0.3%.

  • Issuer Impact: Banks and fintechs like Revolut warn that a "one-size-fits-all" cap may force them to process certain international transactions at a loss.

This ruling cements the PSR’s role as a proactive price regulator. It signals a shift away from the "red tape" reduction seen in other sectors, prioritizing the bottom line of UK merchants over the revenue streams of global payment networks.

Lawyer Monthly Ad
osgoodepd lawyermonthly 1100x100 oct2025
generic banners explore the internet 1500x300

JUST FOR YOU

9 (1)
Sign up to our newsletter for the latest Featured Updates
Subscribe to Lawyer Monthly Magazine Today to receive all of the latest news from the world of Law.
skyscraperin genericflights 120x600tw centro retargeting 0517 300x250

About the Author

George Daniel
George Daniel has been a contributing legal writer for Lawyer Monthly since 2015, covering consumer rights, workplace law, and key developments across the U.S. justice system. With a background in legal journalism and policy analysis, his reporting explores how the law affects everyday life—from employment disputes and family matters to access-to-justice reform. Known for translating complex legal issues into clear, practical language, George has spent the past decade tracking major court decisions, legislative shifts, and emerging social trends that shape the legal landscape.
More information
Connect with LM

About Lawyer Monthly

Legal Intelligence. Trusted Insight. Since 2009

Follow Lawyer Monthly