Key Questions People Are Asking
Why are Priscilla Presley’s lawyers “blasting” the lawsuit?
Understand Your Rights. Solve Your Legal Problems
Priscilla Presley’s attorneys have condemned claims about Riley Keough included in an amended lawsuit filed in Los Angeles Superior Court.
The civil dispute, already marked by duelling claims over business arrangements and alleged wrongdoing, intensified after new allegations were introduced in December.
The case matters now because judges must decide what belongs in the lawsuit and how far the legal fight involving the Presley family can go.
Priscilla Presley’s lawyers are forcefully pushing back after a newly filed amended complaint introduced allegations involving her granddaughter, actor Riley Keough, in an ongoing Los Angeles civil lawsuit.
The filing, submitted in Los Angeles Superior Court in mid-December, is part of a long-running legal battle between Presley and former business associates that has steadily escalated since 2024.
In a public response, Presley’s attorneys Marty Singer and Wayne Harman accused the plaintiffs of crossing ethical lines by injecting matters they say are unrelated to the actual legal claims before the court.
Their statement underscored the emotional and reputational stakes for a family already navigating intense public scrutiny following the death of Lisa Marie Presley.
While the case is civil, not criminal, the consequences are significant.
Multiple lawsuits, high-value damages claims, and sharply opposed narratives have turned the dispute into a procedural and personal showdown, with the court now positioned to decide how broadly the litigation will be allowed to expand.
An amended complaint was filed in Los Angeles Superior Court by Brigitte Kruse and Kevin Fialko, former business associates of Priscilla Presley.
The revised filing expanded on earlier claims and introduced new allegations referencing Riley Keough, Lisa Marie Presley’s daughter and Priscilla Presley’s granddaughter.
The lawsuit alleges extensive unpaid services and disputed business arrangements connected to the Presley family’s personal and professional affairs following Lisa Marie Presley’s death.
The plaintiffs claim they played central roles in managing and mediating family-related matters during that period.
Priscilla Presley’s legal team responded publicly, stating that the new allegations are irrelevant to the legal issues being litigated and asserting that prior efforts by the plaintiffs to gain procedural leverage, including attempts to disqualify Presley’s counsel have failed.
The amended complaint follows a series of legal actions. In 2024, Presley sued Kruse and Fialko for $1 million, alleging financial elder abuse. The following month, the pair filed their own lawsuit seeking $50 million, accusing Presley of breaching business agreements.
This dispute sits squarely in civil law, involving claims related to contracts, compensation for services, and alleged financial misconduct.
Courts handling cases like this typically focus on whether enforceable agreements existed, who had authority to act on behalf of whom, what services were authorized, and whether compensation was owed.
Amended complaints are a routine feature of civil litigation, allowing parties to revise or expand their claims. However, courts can limit or strike allegations that are deemed legally irrelevant or improper.
That process often unfolds through pretrial motions that test whether claims meet legal standards before discovery proceeds.
No criminal charges are involved. Any outcomes would be civil in nature, potentially including damages, dismissal of claims, or negotiated settlements depending on how the court rules on the pleadings and evidence.
Presley’s attorneys say the amended complaint includes allegations that have no legal connection to the claims being litigated and argue they were added to exert pressure rather than advance the case.
Is Riley Keough being sued?
Being referenced in a lawsuit is not the same as being named as a defendant. The core litigation remains between Priscilla Presley and her former business associates.
What does an amended complaint actually do?
It replaces or supplements earlier versions of a lawsuit, potentially adding new allegations or claims. Courts still decide which parts are allowed to proceed.
Where does the case go next?
The case is expected to continue through pretrial motion practice and discovery, where judges determine the scope of admissible claims and evidence.
Could this case settle?
Many civil cases resolve through settlement after key procedural rulings clarify risks and legal boundaries, though outcomes depend on court decisions and party negotiations.
This case highlights how civil litigation, celebrity or not, can expand quickly once amended pleadings introduce new allegations.
Courts play a critical gatekeeping role, separating legally relevant claims from material that may be emotionally charged but procedurally improper.
It also underscores the risks of informal or loosely defined business relationships, especially when personal trust overlaps with professional services.
Written agreements, clear authority, and documented compensation remain central protections in any civil dispute.
Finally, the case shows how reputational harm can become intertwined with legal proceedings, even when no criminal conduct is alleged.
Best-case procedural scenario: The court narrows the lawsuit early, limiting the case to clearly defined contract and damages issues.
Worst-case procedural scenario: The dispute broadens, leading to prolonged discovery, higher costs, and extended litigation timelines.
Most common procedural pathway: Continued motions followed by discovery, with settlement discussions emerging once the court clarifies which claims will move forward.
Does filing an allegation make it true?
No. Allegations are claims, not findings. Courts evaluate them through evidence and legal standards.
Can a judge remove parts of a lawsuit?
Yes. Judges can strike or dismiss allegations that do not meet legal requirements.
Is this case criminal?
No. It is a civil dispute being handled in Los Angeles Superior Court.
Why are lawyers speaking publicly?
In high-profile cases, public statements are often used to address reputational impact, though courtroom outcomes depend on filings and rulings.
Priscilla Presley’s legal team pushing back against lawsuit claims involving Riley Keough marks a critical stage in a civil case that continues to widen in scope and attention.
The key question now is not who will ultimately prevail, but which allegations the court will permit to move forward as the case advances.
As judges review the amended complaint, their procedural decisions will shape the next phase of litigation - determining whether the dispute becomes more narrowly focused or remains an expansive and highly public legal battle.
👉 Priscilla Presley & Riley Keough Deny $50M Lawsuit 👈
