Understand Your Rights. Solve Your Legal Problems
winecapanimated1250x200 optimize
Education & Public Policy

N.J. Family Hit With $41K School Tuition Bill After District Says They Lied About Where They Lived — Judge Says “No Credible Evidence” of Hardship

Reading Time:
4
 minutes
Posted: 21st November 2025
George Daniel
Last updated 21st November 2025
Share this article
In this Article

A Middlesex County family has been ordered to repay a staggering $41,500 in school tuition after New Jersey education officials ruled their children attended the Milltown school district while the family was actually living miles away in North Brunswick.

The ruling — adopted Oct. 31 by the state education commissioner — concludes the parents falsely claimed to be homeless in order to keep their children enrolled in Milltown schools while their new home was under construction. An administrative law judge rejected their explanation as “not credible,” saying there was no proof the move was due to hardship or necessity.

For the district, it’s one of the largest tuition clawbacks in recent memory.
For the family, it’s a financial disaster.


Judge: Family wasn’t homeless — they simply moved and kept the kids in Milltown

According to court records, the family lived in North Brunswick from November 2023 through March 2025 while continuing to send their children to Milltown schools. Under New Jersey law, homeless students can remain in their original district without paying tuition — but the burden of proof falls on the family.

Judge Allison Friedman said that burden wasn’t met.

She found:

  • The family chose to leave their Clay Street apartment

  • They moved into a “larger” North Brunswick home

  • They took their valuables — TVs, computers, schoolwork, clothing — when they left

  • There was no evidence of an illegal lockout

  • There was no evidence they ever slept in the Milltown home under renovation

Friedman wrote the parents “failed to show a financial need” to remain in North Brunswick for more than a year.

The commissioner agreed.

Milltown officials declined to comment.


N.J. school districts are cracking down — and families are getting hit with giant bills

This case comes as districts across the state ramp up residency investigations amid rising enrollment pressures and shrinking budgets. Residency enforcement — once sporadic — has become increasingly aggressive:

  • Landlords are reporting families to school districts

  • Districts are hiring private investigators

  • Surprise home visits are more common

  • Tuition back-billing now frequently reaches tens of thousands of dollars

State law allows districts to recover 100% of tuition if a family is found living outside district lines. In some cases, that number climbs into six figures.

Advocates argue the crackdown disproportionately targets low- and middle-income families navigating housing instability, construction delays, or temporary relocations.

But districts counter that out-of-town enrollment strains already tight budgets — and taxpayers shouldn’t subsidize students who don’t legally live there.

This case underscores the high stakes: One family, one move, one ruling — and a $41,500 bill.


How the residency investigation unfolded

The dispute began after the family sold their Milltown home in 2022 and temporarily moved to another Milltown address. They later relocated to North Brunswick in November 2023 during reconstruction of a home owned by the children’s grandmother.

The issue exploded when the Clay Street landlord notified Milltown that the children no longer lived there.

On April 24, 2024, Superintendent Stephanie Brown requested updated residency documents. Four days later, the parents submitted an affidavit claiming they were living at the under-construction Milltown home on Highland Drive.

But when pressed, the mother admitted they were actually living in North Brunswick, according to court documents.

The judge concluded the family did not return to the Milltown property until it received a temporary certificate of occupancy on March 6, 2025.

“There is no credible evidence to support the need to stay in North Brunswick for more than a year,” Friedman wrote.

She also found the family had not suffered “economic hardship,” noting they received proceeds from the sale of their previous Milltown home.


Legal Analysis: What the Ruling Means Under New Jersey Education Law

New Jersey’s residency and homeless-student laws sit at the center of this case — and the outcome shows just how strict those standards have become.

Under N.J.A.C. 6A:17-2.3, students who are genuinely homeless may continue attending their original school district without paying tuition. But the law places the burden of proof entirely on the family to show that homelessness was caused by factors beyond their control, such as eviction, unsafe conditions, or emergency displacement.

In this case, Administrative Law Judge Allison Friedman determined the family did not meet that threshold. The judge found there was:

  • No illegal lockout

  • No evidence of displacement or emergency conditions

  • No proof the family ever resided in the Milltown home under renovation

  • Clear evidence they voluntarily moved into a larger home in North Brunswick

Because homelessness was not established, the law required the family to pay full out-of-district tuition for the period their children remained in Milltown schools. State regulations allow districts to recover 100% of tuition when a student attends from outside district lines, even if the family believed they were eligible to remain.

The commissioner’s adoption of the ruling reinforces a broader legal pattern across New Jersey: school districts are increasingly using administrative hearings, landlord reports, and residency investigations to enforce compliance and recover costs. For families, the legal stakes are enormous — a disputed move can result in tens of thousands of dollars in back tuition, even when the circumstances involve construction delays or temporary relocations.

This case illustrates the legal message being sent statewide:
If families cannot document homelessness or residency in strict legal terms, courts will side with districts — and tuition repayment is mandatory.

👉 MTA Updates: Thanksgiving Travel Alert: Major MTA Changes, Extra Trains, Closed Stations — Here’s What NYC Commuters Need to Know 👈

Lawyer Monthly Ad
osgoodepd lawyermonthly 1100x100 oct2025
generic banners explore the internet 1500x300

JUST FOR YOU

9 (1)
Sign up to our newsletter for the latest Legal News Updates
Subscribe to Lawyer Monthly Magazine Today to receive all of the latest news from the world of Law.
skyscraperin genericflights 120x600tw centro retargeting 0517 300x250

About the Author

George Daniel
George Daniel has been a contributing legal writer for Lawyer Monthly since 2015, covering consumer rights, workplace law, and key developments across the U.S. justice system. With a background in legal journalism and policy analysis, his reporting explores how the law affects everyday life—from employment disputes and family matters to access-to-justice reform. Known for translating complex legal issues into clear, practical language, George has spent the past decade tracking major court decisions, legislative shifts, and emerging social trends that shape the legal landscape.
More information
Connect with LM

About Lawyer Monthly

Legal News. Legal Insight. Since 2009

Follow Lawyer Monthly