Understand Your Rights. Solve Your Legal Problems
winecapanimated1250x200 optimize
Birth Injury Law ⋅ Statute of Limitations (CA)

Birth Injury Lawsuits in California

Reading Time:
7
 minutes
Posted: 30th September 2025
Lawyer Monthly
Share this article
In this Article

Birth Injury Lawsuits in California

When a child suffers a birth injury in California, the emotional and financial toll can be devastating. Parents often face mounting medical bills, long-term care costs, and the uncertainty of whether their child will ever fully recover.

In many cases, these injuries result from medical malpractice and professional negligence in California, meaning families may have the right to seek compensation through a birth injury lawsuit.

This article provides an in-depth explanation of how these complex cases work, what constitutes negligence, how California law, particularly the Medical Injury Compensation Reform Act (MICRA) affects recoverable damages, and the strict legal deadlines that must be met.

We will also explore related malpractice areas, since many birth injury lawsuits overlap with broader claims such as surgical errors, misdiagnosis, and medication mistakes, as well as the crucial role of medical experts in proving a case.

Medical Malpractice & Professional Negligence in California

At the heart of any successful birth injury lawsuit is the demonstration of professional negligence.

In the context of childbirth, negligence occurs when a doctor, nurse, hospital staff member, or other healthcare provider fails to deliver care that is consistent with the accepted standard of care within the medical community.

The standard of care is defined as the level of skill and diligence that a reasonably competent healthcare professional in the same specialty would exercise under similar circumstances.

Parents filing a lawsuit must successfully prove four distinct elements to establish professional negligence:

  1. Duty of Care: A professional relationship existed between the healthcare provider and the patient (mother and/or child), establishing a legal duty to provide competent care.
  2. Breach of Duty (Negligence): The provider failed to meet the accepted standard of care.
  3. Causation: The provider’s breach of duty was a direct and proximate cause of the child’s injury.
  4. Damages: The child and family suffered actual, compensable harm and losses as a result of the injury.

Medical Malpractice in California: What Counts as Negligence

Identifying a breach of the standard of care is critical. Examples of negligent actions or omissions during pregnancy, labor, and delivery that can lead to severe birth injuries include:

  • Failing to adequately monitor the fetus for signs of distress (e.g., concerning heart rate patterns, a sign of oxygen deprivation).
  • Misusing delivery tools such as forceps or vacuum extractors, leading to skull fractures, cranial hemorrhages, or nerve damage (like brachial plexus injury).
  • Ignoring or mismanaging maternal health complications such as preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, or infections (e.g., Group B strep).
  • Delayed decisions or a complete failure to perform a timely emergency C-section when minutes matter in a high-risk delivery.
  • Improper resuscitation of a newborn immediately following birth, leading to critical oxygen deprivation (hypoxia).

Parents filing a lawsuit must show, with the aid of medical experts, that this specific negligence directly caused the child’s injury, such as cerebral palsy, HIE, or Erb’s palsy.

Patients who believe a healthcare provider in California breached the standard of care and caused harm can file a complaint with the Medical Board of California to trigger an investigation into substandard or negligent care.

MICRA and Damage Caps in California Medical Malpractice Cases

California’s Medical Injury Compensation Reform Act (MICRA) significantly impacts the compensation a family can recover in a birth injury lawsuit.

While the act was originally passed in 1975, it was substantially reformed and updated in 2022 by AB 35.

The Cap on Non-Economic Damages

Under MICRA, a cap is placed on non-economic damages, which are intended to compensate the injured person for subjective losses like pain, suffering, emotional distress, disfigurement, and loss of enjoyment of life.

This cap is a critical factor in settlement negotiations.

The updated MICRA structure for non-economic damages, implemented in 2023, is:

  • Injury Cases (Non-Death): The cap began at and is scheduled to increase by annually until it reaches .
  • Wrongful Death Cases: The cap began at and is scheduled to increase by annually until it reaches million.

Crucially, the new law also allows for separate caps for each healthcare provider or institution (up to three), potentially increasing the total award in cases involving multiple negligent parties.

For more details, see the California Legislature’s Assembly Bill 35 (2022), which reformed MICRA.

Uncapped Economic Damages

It is essential for parents to understand that economic damages are not capped by MICRA.

Economic damages cover tangible financial losses, which are often the largest component of a birth injury claim, particularly those resulting in lifelong disabilities. These include:

  • Past and future medical expenses (surgeries, hospital stays, medication).
  • Costs of long-term care, therapy, and specialized equipment (wheelchairs, ventilators).
  • Lost future earning capacity for the child over their lifetime.
  • Lost wages for parents forced to leave work to become full-time caregivers.
  • Cost of in-home care, necessary home modifications, and rehabilitation.

Because economic damages are uncapped, securing compensation for a child suffering from a severe, permanent injury like cerebral palsy can still result in a substantial, multi-million dollar recovery intended to cover the true cost of their lifetime care.

Surgical Errors: Patient Rights in California

Sometimes birth injuries occur because of surgical errors during C-sections or emergency procedures.

For example, a botched incision that causes internal damage, a failure to control maternal bleeding, or negligently delayed surgery can lead to severe harm for both mother and child.

California law vigorously upholds patient rights by allowing individuals to seek accountability when surgical mistakes result from a breach of the standard of care.

Patients can review their rights and complaint options through the California Department of Public Health’s complaint investigation process.

This right includes pursuing claims against the surgeon, the anesthesiologist, and the facility itself for:

  • Performing the wrong procedure or operating on the wrong site.
  • Leaving foreign objects (e.g., sponges or instruments) inside the body.
  • Causing unnecessary trauma to the mother or child during an emergency procedure.

A fundamental part of patient rights is informed consent. While a C-section is often an emergency procedure, a failure to explain foreseeable risks or a complete lack of consent in non-emergency situations can be an additional cause of action in a surgical error lawsuit.

Misdiagnosis and Delayed Diagnosis Claims in California

Another frequent cause of birth injuries is misdiagnosis or delayed diagnosis of a critical condition in the mother or the fetus.

If a healthcare provider fails to diagnose or properly manage conditions like:

  • Maternal infections that can cross the placental barrier.
  • Placental issues (e.g., placenta previa or abruption).
  • Fetal growth restriction or other signs of distress during prenatal care.

The newborn may suffer preventable injuries such as hypoxia or brain damage.

In California, parents may pursue claims if they can definitively prove that the delay or misdiagnosis directly caused a worse outcome for the child than would have occurred with timely and appropriate medical intervention.

Medication and Pharmacy Error Lawsuits in California

Pregnant mothers are especially vulnerable to medication and pharmacy errors. Incorrect dosages, dangerous prescriptions, or drug interactions can lead to complications like premature birth, low birth weight, or developmental delays.

Families can hold both prescribing doctors (for professional negligence) and pharmacists (for dispensing errors) liable in California courts for the resulting injuries.

This dual-liability potential means that a thorough legal investigation must track the origin of the prescription error, from the doctor's order to the final dispensing process.

Nursing Home Abuse and Neglect in California (Maternal Care Settings)

While typically associated with elder care, the principles of negligence and statutory protections against abuse can extend to maternal care settings. This is relevant in cases where negligence occurs in:

  • Long-term skilled nursing facilities utilized for high-risk pregnancies requiring extended bed rest and specialized medical monitoring.
  • Postpartum recovery units where a mother or infant requires long-term, specialized care after delivery.

If a mother or infant suffers injury due to negligent monitoring, sanitation failures, or abusive care in these settings, such as preventable infections or failure to respond to signs of medical distress, families can seek justice under the same malpractice framework that holds facilities accountable for substandard professional care.

To report suspected abuse or neglect, families can file a complaint through the California Department of Public Health’s Licensing and Certification Program.

Dental Malpractice Claims in California and Pregnancy

It may seem unrelated, but dental malpractice claims in California sometimes intersect with pregnancy.

Improper dental treatment, anesthesia errors, or the failure to treat or properly manage severe infections (which can impact fetal health systemically) can pose serious risks to unborn children.

These cases illustrate how a provider's professional negligence in seemingly unrelated specialties can still impact birth outcomes, and liability will be determined by whether a reasonably prudent dental professional would have acted differently knowing the patient’s pregnant status.

Psychiatric Malpractice and Mental Health Provider Liability

Birth injury lawsuits can also involve psychiatric malpractice and mental health provider liability.

For example, a psychiatrist or other mental health provider prescribing unsafe medications to a pregnant patient, or failing to properly consult with the patient’s obstetrician, can create unnecessary risk for the developing fetus.

Furthermore, a failure to diagnose or adequately treat severe conditions like prenatal or postpartum depression that lead to self-harm or harm to the infant can be grounds for a professional negligence claim under the principle that mental health providers also owe a duty of care to their patients and, in certain circumstances, to the fetus.

Telemedicine Malpractice: Emerging Issues in California

With the rise of digital healthcare, telemedicine malpractice has become an emerging issue in California.

Miscommunication during virtual prenatal appointments, failure to recognize high-risk warning signs (which might be more difficult to spot remotely), or inadequate follow-up care can result in preventable birth injuries.

Parents should know that telemedicine providers are held liable under the same standard of care as traditional physicians.

The Medical Board of California’s Telehealth Guidelines explain the rules and responsibilities providers must follow when delivering digital care.

The legal question is whether a reasonably competent provider would have required an in-person visit given the observed digital symptoms.

Strict Legal Deadlines: The Statute of Limitations

One of the most critical aspects of a birth injury lawsuit in California is the statute of limitations.

For most birth injury claims filed on behalf of the child, the deadline is before the child’s eighth birthday.

This extended period recognizes that injuries like cerebral palsy may not be diagnosed until years after the birth.

However, claims against government entities (public hospitals) must generally be filed within six months of the incident, making immediate legal consultation paramount.

Seeking Accountability and Final Recourse

Birth injury lawsuits in California are complex, involving layers of professional negligence law, the financial limitations of MICRA, and crossovers with numerous other malpractice claims.

Whether the injury stems from a surgical error that violates a patient’s rights, a delayed diagnosis, or even a telemedicine oversight, California families have legal pathways to hold providers accountable.

For parents navigating this process, consulting with an experienced California malpractice attorney is the essential first step toward securing justice and the financial stability required for their child’s future.


People Also Ask

What is considered medical malpractice during childbirth in California?
Medical malpractice occurs when a doctor, nurse, or hospital staff member fails to meet the accepted standard of care, leading to preventable injuries such as cerebral palsy, hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE), or brachial plexus injury.

Does California have damage caps in birth injury lawsuits?
Yes. Under MICRA, California caps non-economic damages (like pain and suffering) starting at $350,000 in 2023, with annual increases until it reaches $750,000 for injury cases and $1 million for wrongful death. Economic damages, such as medical bills and long-term care costs, are uncapped.

How long do I have to file a birth injury lawsuit in California?
Most claims on behalf of a child must be filed before the child’s eighth birthday. However, claims against government hospitals often have a much shorter deadline—just six months—so it’s critical to act quickly.

Can surgical errors during a C-section lead to malpractice claims?
Yes. Surgical mistakes such as delayed emergency C-sections, internal injuries, or leaving foreign objects inside the body can form the basis of a malpractice lawsuit if they result from a breach of the standard of care.

Are telemedicine providers liable for birth injuries in California?
Yes. Telemedicine providers must follow the same standard of care as in-person physicians. If a reasonable provider would have required an in-person exam but failed to do so, families may have grounds for a malpractice claim.

What compensation can families recover in a California birth injury case?
Families may recover both economic damages (medical expenses, long-term care, lost earnings) and non-economic damages (pain, suffering, loss of enjoyment of life). Economic damages are not capped, which is vital in cases involving lifelong disabilities.

Lawyer Monthly Ad
osgoodepd lawyermonthly 1100x100 oct2025
generic banners explore the internet 1500x300

JUST FOR YOU

9 (1)
Sign up to our newsletter for the latest Brain Injuries Updates
Subscribe to Lawyer Monthly Magazine Today to receive all of the latest news from the world of Law.
skyscraperin genericflights 120x600tw centro retargeting 0517 300x250
Connect with LM

About Lawyer Monthly

Lawyer Monthly is a consumer-focused legal resource built to help you make sense of the law and take action with confidence.

Follow Lawyer Monthly