Understand Your Rights. Solve Your Legal Problems
winecapanimated1250x200 optimize
Legal News

The Top 10 Trademark Battles That Swept 2017

Reading Time:
9
 minutes
Posted: 14th December 2017
Richard Rossington
Last updated 6th June 2018
Share this article
In this Article

3. Lexmark International Inc. v. Impression Products Inc.

In this case between Lexmark International, a Chinese-owned laser printer and imaging product manufacturer, and Impression Products, a family-owned West Virginia printer and cartridge company, rules surrounding the first sale doctrine changed.

The Supreme Court decided that after the sale of a patented item, the patent holder cannot sue for patent infringement relating to further use of that item, even when in violation of a contract with a customer or imported from outside the US.

Impression Products has been buying used Lexmark cartridges, filling them, replacing a microchip on the cartridge ands reselling them. This of course resulted in a lawsuit for infringement of several patents related to the ink cartridges. This decision can now affect many manufactured products, from high tech consumer goods to prescription drugs.

[pag]

Lawyer Monthly Ad

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

osgoodepd lawyermonthly 1100x100 oct2025
generic banners explore the internet 1500x300

JUST FOR YOU

9 (1)
Sign up to our newsletter for the latest Corporate Updates
Subscribe to Lawyer Monthly Magazine Today to receive all of the latest news from the world of Law.
skyscraperin genericflights 120x600tw centro retargeting 0517 300x250

About the Author

Richard Rossington
Connect with LM

About Lawyer Monthly

Legal News. Legal Insight. Since 2009

Follow Lawyer Monthly