Understand Your Rights. Solve Your Legal Problems
winecapanimated1250x200 optimize
Legal News

Legal Firms Risk Losing Custom by Playing Generic Music on Hold

Reading Time:
2
 minutes
Posted: 17th August 2016
Jacob Mallinder
Last updated 12th September 2016
Share this article
In this Article

Legal firms’ call handling standards have come into question as the result of a major new study into telephone practice.

The research conducted by audio branding specialist PHMG, which audited 766 firms in the legal trade, discovered the large majority risk losing custom by subjecting customers to generic music and audio while on hold.

Typically, waiting on hold is seen as a major bugbear but 51% of legal firms still leave customers listening to nothing but generic music. A further 25% subject callers to beeps, while 18% leave them in silence and 4% force them to listen to ringing.

Only one per cent employ brand-consistent voice and music messaging - viewed as the best practice approach to handling calls – which is less than the national average of 2%.

Mark Williamson, Sales and Marketing Director at PHMG, said: “Call handling remains a critically undervalued element of customer service and marketing. A previous study of 1,000 UK consumers found 73% will not do business with a company again if their first call isn’t handled satisfactorily.

“Therefore, it is important companies do their utmost to improve the experience. The research shows there is still work to be done in providing an experience that keeps callers engaged and entertained.

“Generic music, beeps, ringing or silence convey a message that the customer is not valued, which will only serve to compound any annoyance felt as a result of being made to wait on hold.”

The research also found 96% of legal firms do not even use auto attendant messaging to greet customers who call up outside of normal working hours.

It also seems call handling standards have not significantly improved when comparing the results to a similar study conducted in 2013. The number of companies playing repetitive music has increased by 24% during that period and there has been a 2% improvement in the number using brand-consistent voice and music.

“The trends over the past three years suggest legal firms believe generic music is enough to keep callers entertained but this can actually have the opposite effect,” added Williamson.

“An existing, generic piece of music should not be repurposed to convey a message it was never intended to, as its characteristics may not match those of the company.

Hearing is one of our most powerful emotional senses so the sounds customers hear when they call a business will create a long-lasting impression. Every element of a music track, whether tempo, pitch or instrumentation, will stir different emotions so traders should ensure they convey the appropriate brand image.”

(Source: PHMG)

Lawyer Monthly Ad

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

osgoodepd lawyermonthly 1100x100 oct2025
generic banners explore the internet 1500x300

JUST FOR YOU

9 (1)
Sign up to our newsletter for the latest Legal News Updates
Subscribe to Lawyer Monthly Magazine Today to receive all of the latest news from the world of Law.
skyscraperin genericflights 120x600tw centro retargeting 0517 300x250

About the Author

Jacob Mallinder
Jacob has been working around the Legal Industry for over 10 years, whether that's writing for Lawyer Monthly or helping to conduct interviews with Lawyers across the globe. In his own time, he enjoys playing sports, walking his dogs, or reading.
More information
Connect with LM

About Lawyer Monthly

Lawyer Monthly is a consumer-focused legal resource built to help you make sense of the law and take action with confidence.

Follow Lawyer Monthly