Electoral Reforms – Plenty of political noise, but what of the implications?
16 Apr, 2015
Continual tinkering to the pensions system will cause people to lose confidence
- Long-term savers need encouragement to take on the burden of self-provision, rather than finding more barriers around tax-efficient saving
- Andy James, head of retirement planning, Towry comments on various proposed changes by the main political parties in the 2015 General Election
- Pensioners with annuities allowed to swap these for cash lump sums from April 2016; triple lock set to be maintained
- Labour to cut additional-rate tax relief to 20%; Conservatives will also cut tax relief for highest earners
- Lifetime tax relief to be cut from £1.25m to £1m (Labour could also cut the annual allowance to £30k); Lib Dems have ruled out scrapping the 25% tax-free lump sum
“Pension changes have been rife during the current Parliament, and many of the announcements have rightly been heralded as a success for pensioners with greater freedom over their retirement funding – albeit freedom which comes with greater personal responsibility. But there is still a major concern as to whether pension companies are going to be ready for the changes affecting the industry. In addition, the Government’s intention of providing guidance at retirement is likely to be wholly inadequate for many individuals – especially in light of the various changes and those that are to come.
“Let’s not forget also the projected tax harvest for HMRC increases materially as a result of these changes, thus indicating the need for thoughtful and reasoned financial advice in optimising a pension withdrawal strategy.
“Under the new lifetime allowance of £1m, set to be introduced in April 2016, the maximum pension someone is able to receive without the pension fund incurring a tax charge will be around £34,000 annually, reduced from £42,000 (assuming they choose not to receive a tax-free cash sum from their pension plan)¹. This limit cut also represents a 45% decrease from the £1.8m rate which was in place in early 2012.
“With the tax charge on any excess over the limit running at up to 55 per cent, there is certainly a need to take action to prevent the tax consequences if at all possible. This is especially important if you have your pension invested and it is approaching the lifetime allowance – there is little need to take more risk to chase the growth of your fund if it will be heavily taxed.
“The announcement that the allowance will be index-linked from 2018 helps to reassure savers and the industry that it will rise in future. However, proposed changes notwithstanding, having made repeated attempts to ‘simplify’ the pensions landscape further, material changes to the current system need to be carefully considered if confidence in pensions as a credible method of retirement planning is to be maintained. It is more vital than ever that people adopt a planning-led approach to saving for their financial future.”
Capital gains tax
- Lib Dems propose to raise CGT to 35% and slash tax-free allowance to around £2,500
“With the personal capital gains tax allowance standing at £11,100 in the new tax year, the Liberal Democrat proposal would certainly not prove popular, although they claim it would be necessary to help fund other tax cuts that have been made and are being discussed. The economy, while stable, is hardly showing great signs of life given low inflation figures, and additional CGT taxation could put people’s disposable income levels under more pressure – which will not help stimulate growth. The attraction of making gains on your personal investments would also be eroded by any tax increase.
“The number of legitimate tax reliefs available to long-term savers has reduced over time. Consequently, we would encourage flexible and mainstream reliefs such as those applicable to CGT to remain in place.”
- Conservatives and Lib Dems set to raise personal allowance to £12,500 by 2020; Ukip wish to raise to £13,500
- Conservatives also wish to raise income limits against which higher rate tax would be chargeable to £50,000 by 2020. The two moves together would cut over £7bn from income tax
- Labour seeking to raise additional rate of income tax back to 50p and reintroduce 10% rate; while Ukip want new 35% tax band between £42k and £55k
“For all the criticism the Conservatives take in looking to cut taxes for higher earners, it is laudable that there is now a five figure personal allowance that helps all full-time workers in Britain. But there is undoubtedly a balance to be struck – tax thresholds cannot increase indefinitely and a Labour government will indeed see more money raised for the Treasury to help clear the deficit.”
- Labour call for mansion tax on properties over £2m
- Coalition recently introduced stamp duty reforms while Lib Dems abandoned mansion tax plan in favour of an extra 1% council tax on homes worth £2m+
“Should property continue to rise in value at its current rates, thousands of additional houses in London and the South East may over the next decade tip over £2m, which already triggers an effective stamp duty tax rate of 7.69% per cent for the buyer following the recent reforms. There is therefore a presence of a high taxation already – a £2m property is worth £153,750 in stamp duty charges, which puts the total tax burden of those falling into this category into perspective.”
- Conservatives wish to raise inheritance tax threshold for married couples and civil partners to £1m
- UKIP pledge to scrap inheritance tax altogether
“The inheritance tax bands have been pegged at a relatively low level for some time now. Significant rises in the property market over recent years are pushing many people – perhaps unwittingly – into larger IHT bills. The current freeze in the nil-rate band, given rises in property values, is resulting in more money finding its way to the taxman. However, there are steps people can take to mitigate their potential IHT liability – including putting money into tax-efficient trusts and gifting to charities and/or loved ones.
“Even at the higher band of £1m, one in ten UK households are sitting on assets totalling at least that amount, but those households would at least see their inheritance tax bill greatly reduced. Inter-generational wealth transfer is key – given the increased challenges the younger generation will face to fund their own retirement, many will be relying on gifts made through their inheritance.
“With greater pension freedoms, more families may increasingly run down their residue capital pots, and as a consequence, bequests may be impacted.”
Increases for 2015/16
- 2014 – 15 tax year
- 2015 – 16 tax year
(annual limit unless stated)
BASIC STATE PENSION
- £113.10 per week
- £115.93 per week
- £variable – standard amount is £148.35 per week
- Standard amount of £151.25 per week
Money purchase annual allowance
Personal allowance (basic)
Basic rate of 20% on income up to
Higher rate of 40% on income
- £31,866 – £150,000
- £31,786 – £150,000
- £20.50 per week (eldest child)
- £20.70 per week (eldest child)
- £13.55 per week (additional children)
- £13.70 per week (additional children)
- £variable (between £21.44 and £81.30 per week) £variable (between £21.80 and £82.30 per week)
Working tax credit
- Basic amount is up to £1,940
- Basic amount is up to £1,960
- First £125k
- Over £1.5m
CAPITAL GAINS TAX
¹ Assuming a 65 year old male, 50% spouses pension, no guaranteed payment period and index-linked payments rising with RPI. As of 18th March 2015 a £100,000 pension fund would pay £3,378 per year gross of tax. Extrapolated up to a £1.25m pension fund this would equal £42,225 gross of tax. Extrapolated up to a £1m pension fund this would equal £33,780 gross of tax. Source: Money Advice Service